Abstract
The golden ratio is a frequently studied topic in many scientific disciplines, and, in psychology, it has been proposed as being a (universal) law governing aesthetic preferences. Empirical evidence for the golden ratio is equivocal and typically demonstrated through explicit (i.e., conscious, deliberate) evaluations using direct measurement methods (e.g., surveys). Here, we examined whether the golden ratio reflects an automatically elicited preference using the Implicit Association Test. We used real art images, with the foreground object presented in the golden ratio as well as either in the center (Studies 1 and 2) or 3/4 ratio (Study 3). Both explicit and implicit evaluations did not reveal a clear preference for the golden ratio over other ratios. A possible preference for the golden ratio does not seem to be automatically elicited and may, rather, be driven by art expertise. This again calls into dispute the universality of a preference for the golden ratio.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 91-100 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 01 Feb 2015 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Aesthetics
- Art expertise
- Golden ratio
- Implicit association test
- Implicit evaluation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Applied Psychology