Short-term audiological outcomes of the mCLIP ARC ball joint prosthesis- a retrospective multicenter study

  • Dirk Beutner
  • , N Bevis
  • , S Arndt
  • , C Offergeld
  • , T Lenarz
  • , S Busch
  • , W Wolfram
  • , L Niederwanger
  • , B Loader
  • , F Windisch
  • , C Arnoldner
  • , D Riss
  • , E Schimanski
  • , P M Zwittag
  • , N Rubicz
  • , P H Skarżyński
  • , Ł Plichta
  • , G Sprinzl
  • , A Magele
  • , L Taha
  • J Hornung

Research output: Journal article (peer-reviewed)Journal article

Abstract

PURPOSE: This European multicentric, retrospective study aimed to analyze the short-term safety and effectiveness of the mCLIP ARC Ball Joint Prosthesis.

METHODS: Type III Tympanoplasty with implantation of a mCLIP-ARC Partial Prosthesis was performed. During patients' follow-up, ear microscopic evaluation and pure-tone audiometry were used for analysis. The post-operative pure-tone average of the frequencies 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 kHz (PTA4) were used for calculation of the air bone gap (ABG). Adverse events (AE) were evaluated during follow-up.

RESULTS: 62 patients underwent implantation of the mCLIP-ARC Partial Prosthesis. 55 complete data sets were available for audiological examination. The mean follow-up time was 58 days. In two cases adverse events were recorded. The post-operative bone conduction (BC) PTA4 thresholds were stable in 96.4% of cases. The mean postoperative PTA-4 air-bone gap (ABG) was 16.5 ± 9.2 dB.

CONCLUSION: Implantation of the mCLIP ARC partial prosthesis proves to be safe and reliable. Clinical data show satisfactory audiological results and demonstrate the effectiveness of the new middle ear prosthesis with a balanced ball joint.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5597-5602
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Volume282
Issue number11
Early online date29 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Short-term audiological outcomes of the mCLIP ARC ball joint prosthesis- a retrospective multicenter study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this