Sensing and Detection Performance of the Novel, Small-diameter OmniaSecure Defibrillation Lead: In-depth analysis from the LEADR Trial

Prashanthan Sanders, Pamela K Mason, Bert Hansky, Paolo De Filippo, Maully J Shah, Darius P Sholevar, John S Zakaib, Francois Philippon, Bernice Tsang, Rajeev K Pathak, Travis D Richardson, Meir Friedman, Robert D Schaller, Ignasi Anguera, Attila Mihalcz, Babak Bozorgnia, Amy E Thompson, Katherin Arias, Baerbel Maus, Chad BoundsGeorge H Crossley

Research output: Journal article (peer-reviewed)Journal article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Lead EvaluAtion for Defibrillation and Reliability (LEADR) trial evaluated the small-diameter (4.7Fr), integrated bipolar OmniaSecure defibrillation lead. As previously reported, the trial exceeded primary safety and efficacy objective thresholds, demonstrating favorable performance and zero fractures through ∼12 months follow-up, with patients in ongoing follow-up. Longer-term follow-up of the LEADR trial with emphasis on the sensing and detection capabilities of the OmniaSecure lead are reported here.

METHODS: Patients with indication for de novo ICD/CRT-D were implanted with the OmniaSecure lead in standard right ventricle (RV) locations and followed at prespecified intervals along with CareLink™ remote monitoring transmissions, where available. Throughout follow-up, the lead was evaluated for safety, efficacy, and reliability along with sensing and detection performance.

RESULTS: There were 643/657 patients (97.9%) successfully implanted with the OmniaSecure lead with mean follow-up of 18.2 ± 5.5 months. There was a 96.9% freedom from major study lead-related complications at 2 years. Inappropriate shock rate was 2.7% and 3.8% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. At 2 years, 17.6% of patients received appropriate therapies (shock and/or ATP) with a 76.5% ATP efficacy. There have been zero fractures during follow-up along with chronically stable pacing capture threshold, pacing impedance, and R-wave amplitudes. There were four patients with an adverse event related to PWOS (0.6%), none of which was associated with inappropriate shock. There were four patients with an adverse event related to TWOS (0.6%), of which three patients were associated with inappropriate shock (0.5%). Oversensing was resolved predominantly by programming the RV sensitivity to less sensitive settings. During VF induction at implant, 97.6% (120/123) of patients showed appropriate VF episode detection at the least sensitive setting of 1.2mV, with the remaining having detection at more sensitive settings. In follow-up, 670 VT/VF episodes were appropriately detected and treated in ninety-four patients with a variety of RV sensitivities and no reports of under-detected episodes. Moreover, a virtual sensitivity analysis also showed no under-detection across different RV sensitivity programming.

CONCLUSIONS: Chronic sensing performance of the OmniaSecure defibrillation lead demonstrated R-wave stability with a low rate of P-wave and T-wave oversensing, resolved predominantly by adjusting RV sensitivity. Further, VT/VF detection was successful and was not impacted when programmed to less sensitive settings. The OmniaSecure lead shows robust sensing and detection performance and programmability in ongoing follow-up.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropace
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Mar 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sensing and Detection Performance of the Novel, Small-diameter OmniaSecure Defibrillation Lead: In-depth analysis from the LEADR Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this