TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative Backscattered Electron Imaging of Bone Using a Thermionic or a Field Emission Electron Source
AU - Hartmann, Markus A
AU - Blouin, Stéphane
AU - Misof, Barbara M
AU - Fratzl-Zelman, Nadja
AU - Roschger, Paul
AU - Berzlanovich, Andrea
AU - Gruber, Gerlinde M
AU - Brugger, Peter C
AU - Zwerina, Jochen
AU - Fratzl, Peter
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to Christian Lengauer, Department of Mineralogy and Crystallography, University of Vienna, for providing the investigated mineral samples. We thank Petra Keplinger, Sonja Lueger, and Phaedra Messmer for sample preparation and measurements. This study was supported by the AUVA (Research funds of the Austrian workers compensation board) and OEGK (Austrian Social Health Insurance Fund).
Funding Information:
We are grateful to Christian Lengauer, Department of Mineralogy and Crystallography, University of Vienna, for providing the investigated mineral samples. We thank Petra Keplinger, Sonja Lueger, and Phaedra Messmer for sample preparation and measurements. This study was supported by the AUVA (Research funds of the Austrian workers compensation board) and OEGK (Austrian Social Health Insurance Fund).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Quantitative backscattered electron imaging is an established method to map mineral content distributions in bone and to determine the bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD). The method we applied was initially validated for a scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with a tungsten hairpin cathode (thermionic electron emission) under strongly defined settings of SEM parameters. For several reasons, it would be interesting to migrate the technique to a SEM with a field emission electron source (FE-SEM), which, however, would require to work with different SEM parameter settings as have been validated for DSM 962. The FE-SEM has a much better spatial resolution based on an electron source size in the order of several 100 nanometers, corresponding to an about [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] times smaller source area compared to thermionic sources. In the present work, we compare BMDD between these two types of instruments in order to further validate the methodology. We show that a transition to higher pixel resolution (1.76, 0.88, and 0.57 μm) results in shifts of the BMDD peak and BMDD width to higher values. Further the inter-device reproducibility of the mean calcium content shows a difference of up to 1 wt% Ca, while the technical variance of each device can be reduced to [Formula: see text] wt% Ca. Bearing in mind that shifts in calcium levels due to diseases, e.g., high turnover osteoporosis, are often in the range of 1 wt% Ca, both the bone samples of the patients as well as the control samples have to be measured on the same SEM device. Therefore, we also constructed new reference BMDD curves for adults to be used for FE-SEM data comparison.
AB - Quantitative backscattered electron imaging is an established method to map mineral content distributions in bone and to determine the bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD). The method we applied was initially validated for a scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with a tungsten hairpin cathode (thermionic electron emission) under strongly defined settings of SEM parameters. For several reasons, it would be interesting to migrate the technique to a SEM with a field emission electron source (FE-SEM), which, however, would require to work with different SEM parameter settings as have been validated for DSM 962. The FE-SEM has a much better spatial resolution based on an electron source size in the order of several 100 nanometers, corresponding to an about [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] times smaller source area compared to thermionic sources. In the present work, we compare BMDD between these two types of instruments in order to further validate the methodology. We show that a transition to higher pixel resolution (1.76, 0.88, and 0.57 μm) results in shifts of the BMDD peak and BMDD width to higher values. Further the inter-device reproducibility of the mean calcium content shows a difference of up to 1 wt% Ca, while the technical variance of each device can be reduced to [Formula: see text] wt% Ca. Bearing in mind that shifts in calcium levels due to diseases, e.g., high turnover osteoporosis, are often in the range of 1 wt% Ca, both the bone samples of the patients as well as the control samples have to be measured on the same SEM device. Therefore, we also constructed new reference BMDD curves for adults to be used for FE-SEM data comparison.
KW - Adult
KW - Bone Density
KW - Bone and Bones
KW - Calcification, Physiologic
KW - Electrons
KW - Humans
KW - Reproducibility of Results
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104113718&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00223-021-00832-5
DO - 10.1007/s00223-021-00832-5
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33837801
SN - 0171-967X
VL - 109
SP - 190
EP - 202
JO - Calcified Tissue International
JF - Calcified Tissue International
IS - 2
ER -