Practical clinical skills assessment for a cohort of 680 2nd year human medicine students. Is it feasible?

Michaela Wagner-Menghin, Ingrid Preusche, Michael Schmidts

    Research output: Journal article (peer-reviewed)Journal article

    Abstract

    In clinical skills training objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are the method of choice to foster learning. Hence, implementing them is challenging and expensive. Thus it is investigated how an alternative procedure that keeps OSCE's essential elements, but assigns less stations to each student, works in terms of validity and justifiability.Data of n = 694 students, each taking five tasks drawn semi-randomized out of a pool of 26 tasks, strictly aligned with learning objectives, are analyzed. Despite unsurprisingly low overall reliability, a justifiable pass/fail decision is possible for 480 students (69 %). The remaining group (n = 210, 30 %) is indeed larger than with longer OSCEs, and would need ongoing assessment. The tasks' psychometric quality contributes to exams construct validity. Resource preserving short practical skills assessment is educationally valid and feasible with MedUniVienna's human medicine cohorts of n = 680.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)91-97
    Number of pages7
    JournalWiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
    Volume165
    Issue number5-6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 01 Mar 2015

    Keywords

    • Austria
    • Clinical Competence/standards
    • Cohort Studies
    • Educational Measurement/statistics & numerical data
    • Feasibility Studies
    • Humans
    • Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data
    • Reproducibility of Results

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Practical clinical skills assessment for a cohort of 680 2nd year human medicine students. Is it feasible?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this