Positive fEMG patterns with ambiguity in paintings

Martina Jakesch, Juergen Goller*, Helmut Leder

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal article (peer-reviewed)Journal article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whereas ambiguity in everyday life is often negatively evaluated, it is considered key in art appreciation. In a facial EMG study, we tested whether the positive role of visual ambiguity in paintings is reflected in a continuous affective evaluation on a subtle level. We presented ambiguous (disfluent) and non-ambiguous (fluent) versions of Magritte paintings and found that M. Zygomaticus major activation was higher and M. corrugator supercilii activation was lower for ambiguous than for non-ambiguous versions. Our findings reflect a positive continuous affective evaluation to visual ambiguity in paintings over the 5 s presentation time. We claim that this finding is indirect evidence for the hypothesis that visual stimuli classified as art, evoke a safe state for indulging into experiencing ambiguity, challenging the notion that processing fluency is generally related to positive affect.

Original languageEnglish
Article number785
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume8
Issue numberMAY
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 May 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ambiguity
  • Emotion
  • Empirical aesthetics
  • FEMG
  • Fluency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Positive fEMG patterns with ambiguity in paintings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this