How commercial video games portraying mental illness are connected to stigma: An exploratory study

Gloria Mittmann, Matthias Neumann, Verena Steiner-Hofbauer*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal article (peer-reviewed)Journal article

Abstract

It is well-established that negative portrayal of mental illness (MI) in TV series and fiction can
shape consumers’ attitudes towards MI. However, research concerning the association between
playing video games portraying MI in a stigmatizing manner and players’ attitudes towards
mental health conditions is scarce. To address this gap, an online questionnaire was administered
(N = 119), featuring items measuring participants’ stigma surrounding MI and gaming habits.
Pearson correlation coefficients revealed no significant relationship between the number of
negative video games played and stigma (r (117) = –.060, p = .52) nor between the number of
hours played and stigma (r (117) = -.037, p = .69). Moreover, a t-test did not indicate a signif-
icant difference in stigma between gamers playing video games with negative portrayals of MI (M
= 27.3, SD = 7.1) and non-gamers (M = 29.7, SD = 8.8); t (95) = -1.293, p = .199. These results
indicate that consumption of video games, even those with negative depictions of MI, is not
associated with holding stigmatizing beliefs of MI. Future research could employ experimental
settings to investigate causal relationships between these variables.
Translated title of the contributionWie kommerzielle Videospiele mit Darstellungen psychischer Erkrankungen mit Stigmatisierung zusammenhängen: Eine explorative Studie
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere42804
JournalHeliyon
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Feb 2025

Keywords

  • Mental health
  • Mental disorder
  • Media representation
  • Digital games
  • Attitudes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How commercial video games portraying mental illness are connected to stigma: An exploratory study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this