Generational IQ test score changes and the positive manifold of intelligence: evidence from Austrian Air Force pilots and air traffic controllers (1992–2016)

  • Sandra Oberleiter*
  • , Jana Wurzer
  • , Michael Mikas
  • , Martin Held
  • , Bettina Wieland
  • , Elisabeth L. Zeilinger
  • , Martin Voracek
  • , Jakob Pietschnig
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal article (peer-reviewed)Journal article

Abstract

Increasingly inconsistent generational IQ test score change patterns across recent decades have been suggested to be due to increased ability differentiation as a consequence of cross-temporally decreasing strengths of the positive manifold of intelligence. Here, we investigate the Flynn effect and directly test the idea of a changing positive manifold, based on the performance of N = 204 Austrian Air Force pilots and air traffic controllers across twelve IQ subtests. Subscale change scores indicated consistent gains in measures related to the CHC (Cattell-Horn-Carroll) stratum II domains of fluid reasoning, quantitative knowledge, and retrieval. However, change patterns in the stratum II domains working memory and comprehension knowledge were ambiguous and suggest stratum I-based differentiation of the Flynn effect. In all, our results indicate positive and substantial Flynn effects in the majority of examined subscales, but no evidence for any meaningful changes in the positive manifold strength.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1547520
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • armed forces
  • Austria
  • Cattell-horn-Carroll (CHC) intelligence model
  • Flynn effect
  • pilots
  • positive manifold of intelligence
  • psychometric g

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Generational IQ test score changes and the positive manifold of intelligence: evidence from Austrian Air Force pilots and air traffic controllers (1992–2016)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this