Abstract
Fines for tax evasion are usually based on the amount evaded. The present research shows that laypeople (N = 191) prefer income-adjusted fines in opinion polls, but in the role of a judge they would sometimes act differently. In a factorial survey experiment simulat-ing the negotiation of a court case about tax evasion, fines were adjusted only to the defendant’s income when details about the amount of evasion and the evader’s income but not about the true tax liability were provided. When participants were informed also about the defendant’s full tax liability, they imposed similar fines to high-and low-income earners.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 291-311 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | FinanzArchiv |
| Volume | 78 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01 Jan 2022 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fining Tax Evasion: Is Adjusting Fines to Level of Income Fairer Than Basing Fines Solely on the Evaded Amount?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver