TY - JOUR
T1 - Femur strength predictions by nonlinear homogenized voxel finite element models reflect the microarchitecture of the femoral neck
AU - Iori, Gianluca
AU - Peralta, Laura
AU - Reisinger, Andreas
AU - Heyer, Frans
AU - Wyers, Caroline
AU - van den Bergh, Joop
AU - Pahr, Dieter
AU - Raum, Kay
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - In the human femoral neck, the contribution of the cortical and trabecular architecture to mechanical strength is known to depend on the load direction. In this work, we investigate if QCT-derived homogenized voxel finite element (hvFE) simulations of varying hip loading conditions can be used to study the architecture of the femoral neck. The strength of 19 pairs of human femora was measured ex vivo using nonlinear hvFE models derived from high-resolution peripheral QCT scans (voxel size: 30.3 µm). Standing and side-backwards falling loads were modeled. Quasi-static mechanical tests were performed on 20 bones for comparison. Associations of femur strength with volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) or microstructural parameters of the femoral neck obtained from high-resolution QCT were compared between mechanical tests and simulations and between standing and falling loads. Proximal femur strength predictions by hvFE models were positively associated with the vBMD of the femoral neck (R² > 0.61, p < 0.001), as well as with its cortical thickness (R² > 0.27, p < 0.001), trabecular bone volume fraction (R² = 0.42, p < 0.001) and with the first two principal components of the femoral neck architecture (R² > 0.38, p < 0.001). Associations between femur strength and femoral neck microarchitecture were stronger for one-legged standing than for side-backwards falling. For both loading directions, associations between structural parameters and femur strength from hvFE models were in good agreement with those from mechanical tests. This suggests that hvFE models can reflect the load-direction-specific contribution of the femoral neck microarchitecture to femur strength.
AB - In the human femoral neck, the contribution of the cortical and trabecular architecture to mechanical strength is known to depend on the load direction. In this work, we investigate if QCT-derived homogenized voxel finite element (hvFE) simulations of varying hip loading conditions can be used to study the architecture of the femoral neck. The strength of 19 pairs of human femora was measured ex vivo using nonlinear hvFE models derived from high-resolution peripheral QCT scans (voxel size: 30.3 µm). Standing and side-backwards falling loads were modeled. Quasi-static mechanical tests were performed on 20 bones for comparison. Associations of femur strength with volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) or microstructural parameters of the femoral neck obtained from high-resolution QCT were compared between mechanical tests and simulations and between standing and falling loads. Proximal femur strength predictions by hvFE models were positively associated with the vBMD of the femoral neck (R² > 0.61, p < 0.001), as well as with its cortical thickness (R² > 0.27, p < 0.001), trabecular bone volume fraction (R² = 0.42, p < 0.001) and with the first two principal components of the femoral neck architecture (R² > 0.38, p < 0.001). Associations between femur strength and femoral neck microarchitecture were stronger for one-legged standing than for side-backwards falling. For both loading directions, associations between structural parameters and femur strength from hvFE models were in good agreement with those from mechanical tests. This suggests that hvFE models can reflect the load-direction-specific contribution of the femoral neck microarchitecture to femur strength.
KW - Biomechanical Phenomena
KW - Bone Density
KW - Femur/diagnostic imaging
KW - Finite Element Analysis
KW - Humans
KW - Mechanical Phenomena
KW - Nonlinear Dynamics
KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083052044&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.03.005
DO - 10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.03.005
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 32291201
SN - 1350-4533
VL - 79
SP - 60
EP - 66
JO - Medical Engineering and Physics
JF - Medical Engineering and Physics
ER -