TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals (benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab) for severe eosinophilic asthma. A systematic review for the EAACI Guidelines - recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma
AU - Agache, Ioana
AU - Beltran, Jessica
AU - Akdis, Cezmi
AU - Akdis, Mubeccel
AU - Canelo-Aybar, Carlos
AU - Canonica, Giorgio Walter
AU - Casale, Thomas
AU - Chivato, Tomas
AU - Corren, Jonathan
AU - Del Giacco, Stefano
AU - Eiwegger, Thomas
AU - Firinu, Davide
AU - Gern, James E.
AU - Hamelmann, Eckard
AU - Hanania, Nicola
AU - Mäkelä, Mika
AU - Hernández-Martín, Irene
AU - Nair, Parameswaran
AU - O'Mahony, Liam
AU - Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G.
AU - Papi, Alberto
AU - Park, Hae Sim
AU - Pérez de Llano, Luis
AU - Posso, Margarita
AU - Rocha, Claudio
AU - Quirce, Santiago
AU - Sastre, Joaquin
AU - Shamji, Mohamed
AU - Song, Yang
AU - Steiner, Corinna
AU - Schwarze, Jurgen
AU - Alonso-Coello, Pablo
AU - Palomares, Oscar
AU - Jutel, Marek
N1 - Funding Information:
IA serves as Associate editor of Allergy. JB reports funding from EAACI. CA reports grants from Allergopharma, Idorsia, Swiss National Science Foundation, Christine Kühne‐Center for Allergy Research and Education, European Commission Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Cure, Novartis Research Institutes, AstraZeneca and SciBase and is on the Sanofi/Regeneron advisory board. CC‐A reports funding from EAACI. T Casale reports grants and/or personal fees from Genentech, Novartis, Sanofi Regeneron and GSK. JC declares grants or personal fees from AZ, Genentech/Roche, Novartis, Optinose, Sanofi, Stallergenes and TEVA. SG reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, GSK and Novartis. TE has received grants or other from DBV, Innovation Fund Denmark, Regeneron, the Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program SickKids and serves as Associate editor for Allergy and in the local advisory board of ALK. JG reports personal fees from Regeneron, Ena Therapeutics, MedImmune/AstraZeneca and stock options from Meissa Vaccines Inc NH reports funding, honoraria or personal fees from GSK, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and Sanofi Genzyme, Regeneron, Genentech, Sunovion and Mylan. PN reports grants and/or personal fees from AZ, Novartis, Teva, Sanofi, Roche, Novartis, Merck and Equillium. LOM reports grants from GSK and personal fees from AHL. NP reports grants from Gerolymatos and personal fees from Hal Allergy BV, Novartis Pharma AG, Menarini, Hal Allergy BV and Mylan. AP has received grants, personal fees, nonfinancial support or other from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, TEVA, Mundipharma, Zambon, Novartis, Menarini, Sanofi/Regeneron, Roche, Fondazione Maugeri, Fondazione Chiesi and Edmond Pharma. LP reports grants, personal fees or nonfinancial support from Novartis, AstraZeneca, GSK, TEVA, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Sanofi, Menarini, Mundipharma and Esteve. MP and CR received funding from EAACI. SQ reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from GSK, AZ, Sanofi, Novartis, Mundipharma, Teva and Allergy Therapeutics. JS declares personal fees from Novartis, GSK, AstraZeneca and Sanofi. MS reports personal fees or research funding from ASIT Biotech.sa, Allergy Therapeutics, ALK, Regeneron, Merck, Immune Tolerance Network, Leti Laboratorios and Allergopharma. YS and PA‐C have received funding from EAACI. OP received research grants from Inmunotek SL and Novartis; received fees for giving scientific lectures from Allergy Therapeutics, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Diater, GSK, Inmunotek S.L, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme and Stallergenes; and participated in advisory boards from Novartis and Sanofi Genzyme. MK reports personal fees from ALK‐Abelló, Allergopharma, Stallergenes, Anergis, Allergy Therapeutics, Circassia, Leti, Biomay, HAL, AstraZeneca, GSK, Novartis, Teva, Vectura, UCB, Takeda, Roche, Janssen, MedImmune and Chiesi. All other authors have no conflict of interest within the scope of the submitted work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Five biologicals have been approved for severe eosinophilic asthma, a well-recognized phenotype. Systematic reviews (SR) evaluated the efficacy and safety of benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab (alphabetical order) compared to standard of care for severe eosinophilic asthma. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to identify RCTs and health economic evaluations, published in English. Critical and important asthma-related outcomes were evaluated for each of the biologicals. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using GRADE. 19 RCTs (three RCTs for benralizumab, three RCTs for dupilumab, three RCTs for mepolizumab, five RCTs for omalizumab and five RCTs for reslizumab), including subjects 12 to 75 years old (except for omalizumab including also subjects 6-11 years old), ranging from 12 to 56 weeks were evaluated. All biologicals reduce exacerbation rates with high certainty of evidence: benralizumab incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.53 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.72), dupilumab (IRR) 0.43 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.59), mepolizumab IRR 0.49 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.66), omalizumab (IRR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.77) and reslizumab (IRR) 0.46 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.58). Benralizumab, dupilumab and mepolizumab reduce the daily dose of oral corticosteroids (OCS) with high certainty of evidence. All evaluated biologicals probably improve asthma control, QoL and FEV1, without reaching the minimal important difference (moderate certainty). Benralizumab, mepolizumab and reslizumab slightly increase drug-related adverse events (AE) and drug-related serious AE (low to very low certainty of evidence). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year value is above the willingness to pay threshold for all biologicals (moderate certainty). Potential savings are driven by decrease in hospitalizations, emergency and primary care visits. There is high certainty that all approved biologicals reduce the rate of severe asthma exacerbations and for benralizumab, dupilumab and mepolizumab for reducing OCS. There is moderate certainty for improving asthma control, QoL, FEV1. More data on long-term safety are needed together with more efficacy data in the paediatric population.
AB - Five biologicals have been approved for severe eosinophilic asthma, a well-recognized phenotype. Systematic reviews (SR) evaluated the efficacy and safety of benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab (alphabetical order) compared to standard of care for severe eosinophilic asthma. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to identify RCTs and health economic evaluations, published in English. Critical and important asthma-related outcomes were evaluated for each of the biologicals. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using GRADE. 19 RCTs (three RCTs for benralizumab, three RCTs for dupilumab, three RCTs for mepolizumab, five RCTs for omalizumab and five RCTs for reslizumab), including subjects 12 to 75 years old (except for omalizumab including also subjects 6-11 years old), ranging from 12 to 56 weeks were evaluated. All biologicals reduce exacerbation rates with high certainty of evidence: benralizumab incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.53 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.72), dupilumab (IRR) 0.43 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.59), mepolizumab IRR 0.49 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.66), omalizumab (IRR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.77) and reslizumab (IRR) 0.46 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.58). Benralizumab, dupilumab and mepolizumab reduce the daily dose of oral corticosteroids (OCS) with high certainty of evidence. All evaluated biologicals probably improve asthma control, QoL and FEV1, without reaching the minimal important difference (moderate certainty). Benralizumab, mepolizumab and reslizumab slightly increase drug-related adverse events (AE) and drug-related serious AE (low to very low certainty of evidence). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year value is above the willingness to pay threshold for all biologicals (moderate certainty). Potential savings are driven by decrease in hospitalizations, emergency and primary care visits. There is high certainty that all approved biologicals reduce the rate of severe asthma exacerbations and for benralizumab, dupilumab and mepolizumab for reducing OCS. There is moderate certainty for improving asthma control, QoL, FEV1. More data on long-term safety are needed together with more efficacy data in the paediatric population.
KW - biologicals
KW - cost-effectiveness
KW - efficacy
KW - safety
KW - severe-eosinophilic-asthma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084469274&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/all.14221
DO - 10.1111/all.14221
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 32034960
AN - SCOPUS:85084469274
SN - 0105-4538
VL - 75
SP - 1023
EP - 1042
JO - Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
JF - Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
IS - 5
ER -