Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic literature review

Gernot Wagner, Hannah Karolina Stollenwerk, Irma Klerings, Martin Pecherstorfer, Gerald Gartlehner, Josef Singer

Research output: Journal article (peer-reviewed)Journal article

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Therapeutic strategies with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) counteract the immunosuppressive effects of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and ligand-1 (PD-L1). ICI treatment has emerged in first- and second-line therapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As immunotherapeutic treatment with ICIs is a dynamic field where new drugs and combinations are constantly evaluated, we conducted an up-to-date systematic review on comparative efficacy and safety in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods: We searched PubMed up to February 2020 and Embase, CENTRAL, and clinical trial registries up to August 2018. Additionally, we checked reference lists. We dually screened titles, abstracts and, subsequently, full-texts for eligibility. Two reviewers assessed the risk of bias and graded the certainty of evidence following GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). For second-line therapy, we performed random-effects meta-analyses. Due to considerable clinical heterogeneity, we reported first-line results narratively.

Results: Of 1497 references, we identified 22 relevant publications of 16 studies. For first-line therapy, a combination of an ICI with chemotherapy improved progression-free survival and overall survival compared to chemotherapy but increased the risk of serious adverse events. Single-agent pembrolizumab increased overall and progression-free survival in patients with PD-L1 expression of ≥50% and resulted in less TRAE than chemotherapy. Compared to placebo, maintenance therapy with durvalumab increased overall and progression-free survival at the downside of higher risk of TRAE. For second-line therapy, a random-effects meta-analysis yielded a statistically significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for ICIs compared to docetaxel (HR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.63-0.75 for OS; HR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77 - 0.93 for PFS; 6 studies, 3478 patients; median OS benefit in months: 2.4 to 4.2). In meta-analysis, risk of any treatment-related adverse events of any grade was lower for ICI than docetaxel as second-line therapy (RR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.73-0.79; 6 studies, 3763 patients).

Conclusion: In first-line therapy of patients with advanced NSCLC, ICI is effective when combined with chemotherapy not depending on PD-L1 expression, or as monotherapy in high PD-L1 expressing tumors. For second-line therapy, single-agent ICI improves efficacy and safety compared to docetaxel.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1774314
Pages (from-to)1774314
JournalOncoImmunology
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy
  • Humans
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
  • Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Progression-Free Survival
  • advanced non-small cell lung cancer
  • pd-L1
  • meta-analysis
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors
  • pd-1
  • systematic review
  • nsclc

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic literature review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this