Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Correlation between MRI-derived and biopsy-confirmed liver iron concentration in patients with chronic liver disease

  • Sami A Ba-Ssalamah
  • , Michael Schwarz
  • , Sarah Poetter-Lang
  • , Nina Bastati
  • , Ahmet Y Yitik
  • , Jacqueline C Hodge
  • , Lucian Beer
  • , Nicolas Balutsch
  • , Albert Friedrich Stättermayer
  • , Michael Trauner
  • , Mattias Mandorfer
  • , Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah*
  • , Georg Langs
  • , Benjamin Henninger
  • , Yves Gandon
  • , Ulrike Attenberger
  • , Lukas Haider
  • , Thomas Reiberger
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal article (peer-reviewed) › Journal article

Abstract

Objectives Elevated liver iron concentration (LIC) promotes liver inflammation and fibrosis. LIC can be invasively measured in liver biopsies (Biopsy-LIC) but also non-invasively quantified by MRI. This study compared Biopsy-LIC to whole-liver MRI-LIC in chronic liver disease (CLD) patients using two relaxometry techniques: 3D multi-echo gradient echo processed with Liver-Lab (LL-LIC) and 2D multi-echo gradient echo processed with MRQuantif (MRQ-LIC). Materials and methods Retrospectively, 64 CLD patients (35 females; mean age 50.9 ± 13.5 years) underwent both liver biopsy and 3 T MRI within a median interval of 19 (6–76) days. Two independent readers compared Biopsy-LIC with LL-LIC and MRQ-LIC. Group differences were assessed via regression models adjusted for age, gender, BMI, fat fraction, liver stiffness, and iron panel values. Statistical agreement between measurements was analyzed using Pearson correlation, ICC, and Bland–Altman methodology. Results Mean Biopsy-LIC, LL-LIC, and MRQ-LIC were 0.73 ± 0.80, 0.93 ± 0.59, and 1.06 ± 0.54 mg /g, respectively. Biopsy-LIC strongly correlated with both LL-LIC (r = 0.83) and MRQ-LIC (r = 0.84). Correlation between LL-LIC and MRQ-LIC was even stronger (r = 0.95, p < 0.001). Agreement was excellent between LL-LIC and MRQ-LIC (ICC = 0.946, CI 0.912–0.967) and good between Biopsy-LIC and MR-LICs (ICC = 0.821–0.824). Median biases were −0.29 mg /g (Biopsy-LIC vs. LL-LIC), −0.43 mg /g (Biopsy-LIC vs. MRQ-LIC), and −0.14 mg /g (LL-LIC vs. MRQ-LIC). Conclusion In CLD patients, MRI-based LIC estimates showed strong correlation and excellent agreement with biopsy-derived LIC, regardless of MRI technique.

Original languageEnglish
Article number112484
Pages (from-to)112484
JournalEuropean Journal of Radiology
Volume194
Early online date30 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2026

Keywords

  • 2D-ME-GRE
  • 3D-ME-GRE
  • Liver iron concentration
  • Magnetic resonance image
  • R2* relaxometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correlation between MRI-derived and biopsy-confirmed liver iron concentration in patients with chronic liver disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this