Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of Technetium-99m-MIBI imaging with MRI for detection of spine involvement in patients with multiple myeloma

  • Siroos Mirzaei
  • , Martin Filipits
  • , Andrea Keck
  • , Walter Bergmayer
  • , Peter Knoll
  • , Horst Koehn
  • , Heinz Ludwig
  • , Martin Pecherstorfer

Research output: Journal article (peer-reviewed)Journal article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, radiopharmaceutical scanning with Tc-99m-MIBI was reported to depict areas with active bone disease in multiple myeloma (MM) with both high sensitivity and specificity. This observation was explained by the uptake of Tc-99m-MIBI by neoplastic cells. The present investigation evaluates whether Tc-99m-MIBI imaging and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) perform equally well in detecting myelomatous bone marrow lesions. METHODS: In 21 patients with MM, MRIs of the vertebral region TH12 to S1 and whole body scans with Tc-99m-MIBI were done. RESULTS: Tc-99m-MIBI scanning missed bone marrow infiltration in 43 of 87 vertebrae (50.5%) in which MRI showed neoplastic bone marrow involvement. In patients with disease stage I+II, Tc-99m-MIBI scanning was negative in all of 24 vertebrae infiltrated according to MRI. In patients with disease stage III, Tc-99m-MIBI scanning detected 44 of 63 (70%) vertebrae involved by neoplastic disease. CONCLUSION: Tc-99m-MIBI scanning underestimated the extent of myelomatous bone marrow infiltration in the spine, especially in patients with low disease stage.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2
Pages (from-to)1-4
Number of pages4
JournalBMC nuclear medicine
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Dec 2003
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Technetium-99m-MIBI imaging with MRI for detection of spine involvement in patients with multiple myeloma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this