TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of Disease-Modifying Treatment With Outcome in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis and Isolated MRI Activity
AU - Bsteh, Gabriel
AU - Aicher, Marie L
AU - Walde, Janette F
AU - Krajnc, Nik
AU - Haider, Lukas
AU - Traxler, Gerhard
AU - Gradl, Christiane
AU - Salmen, Anke
AU - Riedl, Katharina
AU - Poskaite, Paulina
AU - Leyendecker, Philipp
AU - Altmann, Patrick
AU - Auer, Michael
AU - Berek, Klaus
AU - Di Pauli, Franziska
AU - Kornek, Barbara
AU - Leutmezer, Fritz
AU - Rommer, Paulus S
AU - Zulehner, Gudrun
AU - Zrzavy, Tobias
AU - Deisenhammer, Florian
AU - Chan, Andrew
AU - Berger, Thomas
AU - Hoepner, Robert
AU - Hammer, Helly
AU - Hegen, Harald
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Neurology.
PY - 2024/9/24
Y1 - 2024/9/24
N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Isolated value of MRI metrics in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) as a surrogate marker of response to disease-modifying treatment (DMT) and, thus, as decision criteria for DMT escalation in the absence of clinical signs of disease activity is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to investigate whether DMT escalation based on isolated MRI activity affects clinical outcome.METHODS: Combining data from 5 MS centers in Austria and Switzerland, we included patients with RMS aged at least 18 years who (1) had initiated first-line, low-to-moderate-efficacy DMT (interferon β, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, or dimethyl fumarate) continued for ≥12 months, (2) were clinically stable (no relapses or disability progression) on DMT for 12 months, (3) had MRI at baseline and after 12 months on DMT, and (4) had available clinical follow-up for ≥2 years after the second MRI. The primary endpoint was occurrence of relapse during follow-up. The number of new T2 lesions (T2L) and DMT strategy (continuing low-/moderate-efficacy DMT vs escalating DMT) were used as covariates in regression analyses.RESULTS: A total of 131 patients with RMS, median age of 36 (25th-75th percentiles: 29-43) years, 73% women, were included and observed over a median period of 6 (5-9) years after second MRI. Sixty-two (47%) patients had relapse. Patients who continued first-line DMT had a 3-fold increased risk of relapse given 2 new T2L (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2, lower limit [LL] of 95% CI: 1.5) and a 4-fold increased risk given ≥3 new T2L (HR 4.0, LL-CI: 2.1). Escalation of DMT lowered the risk of relapse in patients with 2 new T2L by approximately 80% (HR 0.2, upper limit [UL] of 95% CI: 1.3) and with ≥3 new T2L by 70% (HR 0.3, UL-CI: 0.8). In case of only 1 new T2L, the increased risk of relapse and the treatment effect did not reach statistical significance of 5%.DISCUSSION: In our real-world cohort of patients clinically stable under low-to-moderate-efficacy DMT, escalation of DMT based on isolated MRI activity decreased risk of further relapse when at least 2 new T2L had occurred.CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that clinically stable patients with MS on low-/moderate-efficacy DMT with ≥3 new T2L on MRI who escalate DMT have a reduced risk of relapse and Expanded Disability Status Scale progression.
AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Isolated value of MRI metrics in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) as a surrogate marker of response to disease-modifying treatment (DMT) and, thus, as decision criteria for DMT escalation in the absence of clinical signs of disease activity is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to investigate whether DMT escalation based on isolated MRI activity affects clinical outcome.METHODS: Combining data from 5 MS centers in Austria and Switzerland, we included patients with RMS aged at least 18 years who (1) had initiated first-line, low-to-moderate-efficacy DMT (interferon β, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, or dimethyl fumarate) continued for ≥12 months, (2) were clinically stable (no relapses or disability progression) on DMT for 12 months, (3) had MRI at baseline and after 12 months on DMT, and (4) had available clinical follow-up for ≥2 years after the second MRI. The primary endpoint was occurrence of relapse during follow-up. The number of new T2 lesions (T2L) and DMT strategy (continuing low-/moderate-efficacy DMT vs escalating DMT) were used as covariates in regression analyses.RESULTS: A total of 131 patients with RMS, median age of 36 (25th-75th percentiles: 29-43) years, 73% women, were included and observed over a median period of 6 (5-9) years after second MRI. Sixty-two (47%) patients had relapse. Patients who continued first-line DMT had a 3-fold increased risk of relapse given 2 new T2L (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2, lower limit [LL] of 95% CI: 1.5) and a 4-fold increased risk given ≥3 new T2L (HR 4.0, LL-CI: 2.1). Escalation of DMT lowered the risk of relapse in patients with 2 new T2L by approximately 80% (HR 0.2, upper limit [UL] of 95% CI: 1.3) and with ≥3 new T2L by 70% (HR 0.3, UL-CI: 0.8). In case of only 1 new T2L, the increased risk of relapse and the treatment effect did not reach statistical significance of 5%.DISCUSSION: In our real-world cohort of patients clinically stable under low-to-moderate-efficacy DMT, escalation of DMT based on isolated MRI activity decreased risk of further relapse when at least 2 new T2L had occurred.CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that clinically stable patients with MS on low-/moderate-efficacy DMT with ≥3 new T2L on MRI who escalate DMT have a reduced risk of relapse and Expanded Disability Status Scale progression.
KW - Humans
KW - Female
KW - Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy
KW - Male
KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
KW - Adult
KW - Crotonates/therapeutic use
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Nitriles/therapeutic use
KW - Toluidines/therapeutic use
KW - Hydroxybutyrates
KW - Dimethyl Fumarate/therapeutic use
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Glatiramer Acetate/therapeutic use
KW - Interferon-beta/therapeutic use
KW - Austria
KW - Switzerland
KW - Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use
KW - Follow-Up Studies
KW - Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use
KW - Brain/diagnostic imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202792109&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209752
DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209752
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39197111
SN - 0028-3878
VL - 103
SP - e209752
JO - Neurology
JF - Neurology
IS - 6
ER -