TY - JOUR
T1 - A streamlined pathway for transcatheter aortic valve implantation
T2 - the BENCHMARK study
AU - BENCHMARK Investigator Group
AU - Frank, Derk
AU - Durand, Eric
AU - Lauck, Sandra
AU - Muir, Douglas F
AU - Spence, Mark
AU - Vasa-Nicotera, Mariuca
AU - Wood, David
AU - Saia, Francesco
AU - Urbano-Carrillo, Cristóbal A
AU - Bouchayer, Damien
AU - Iliescu, Vlad Anton
AU - Etienne, Christophe Saint
AU - Leclercq, Florence
AU - Auffret, Vincent
AU - Asmarats, Lluis
AU - Di Mario, Carlo
AU - Veugeois, Aurelie
AU - Maly, Jiri
AU - Schober, Andreas
AU - Nombela-Franco, Luis
AU - Werner, Nikos
AU - Gómez-Hospital, Joan Antoni
AU - Mascherbauer, Julia
AU - Musumeci, Giuseppe
AU - Meneveau, Nicolas
AU - Meurice, Thibaud
AU - Mahfoud, Felix
AU - De Marco, Federico
AU - Seidler, Tim
AU - Leuschner, Florian
AU - Joly, Patrick
AU - Collet, Jean-Philippe
AU - Vogt, Ferdinand
AU - Di Lorenzo, Emilio
AU - Kuhn, Elmar
AU - Disdier, Vicente Peral
AU - Hachaturyan, Violetta
AU - Lüske, Claudia M
AU - Rakova, Radka
AU - Wesselink, Wilbert
AU - Kurucova, Jana
AU - Bramlage, Peter
AU - McCalmont, Gemma
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/6/1
Y1 - 2024/6/1
N2 - BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is significant potential to streamline the clinical pathway for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of implementing BENCHMARK best practices on the efficiency and safety of TAVI in 28 sites in 7 European countries.METHODS: This was a study of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing TAVI with balloon-expandable valves before and after implementation of BENCHMARK best practices. Principal objectives were to reduce hospital length of stay (LoS) and duration of intensive care stay. Secondary objective was to document patient safety.RESULTS: Between January 2020 and March 2023, 897 patients were documented prior to and 1491 patients after the implementation of BENCHMARK practices. Patient characteristics were consistent with a known older TAVI population and only minor differences. Mean LoS was reduced from 7.7 ± 7.0 to 5.8 ± 5.6 days (median 6 vs. 4 days; P < .001). Duration of intensive care was reduced from 1.8 to 1.3 days (median 1.1 vs. 0.9 days; P < .001). Adoption of peri-procedure best practices led to increased use of local anaesthesia (96.1% vs. 84.3%; P < .001) and decreased procedure (median 47 vs. 60 min; P < .001) and intervention times (85 vs. 95 min; P < .001). Thirty-day patient safety did not appear to be compromised with no differences in all-cause mortality (0.6% in both groups combined), stroke/transient ischaemic attack (1.4%), life-threatening bleeding (1.3%), stage 2/3 acute kidney injury (0.7%), and valve-related readmission (1.2%).CONCLUSIONS: Broad implementation of BENCHMARK practices contributes to improving efficiency of TAVI pathway reducing LoS and costs without compromising patient safety.
AB - BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is significant potential to streamline the clinical pathway for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of implementing BENCHMARK best practices on the efficiency and safety of TAVI in 28 sites in 7 European countries.METHODS: This was a study of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing TAVI with balloon-expandable valves before and after implementation of BENCHMARK best practices. Principal objectives were to reduce hospital length of stay (LoS) and duration of intensive care stay. Secondary objective was to document patient safety.RESULTS: Between January 2020 and March 2023, 897 patients were documented prior to and 1491 patients after the implementation of BENCHMARK practices. Patient characteristics were consistent with a known older TAVI population and only minor differences. Mean LoS was reduced from 7.7 ± 7.0 to 5.8 ± 5.6 days (median 6 vs. 4 days; P < .001). Duration of intensive care was reduced from 1.8 to 1.3 days (median 1.1 vs. 0.9 days; P < .001). Adoption of peri-procedure best practices led to increased use of local anaesthesia (96.1% vs. 84.3%; P < .001) and decreased procedure (median 47 vs. 60 min; P < .001) and intervention times (85 vs. 95 min; P < .001). Thirty-day patient safety did not appear to be compromised with no differences in all-cause mortality (0.6% in both groups combined), stroke/transient ischaemic attack (1.4%), life-threatening bleeding (1.3%), stage 2/3 acute kidney injury (0.7%), and valve-related readmission (1.2%).CONCLUSIONS: Broad implementation of BENCHMARK practices contributes to improving efficiency of TAVI pathway reducing LoS and costs without compromising patient safety.
KW - Aortic stenosis
KW - Clinical care
KW - Health services
KW - Prospective registry
KW - Quality of care
KW - TAVI
KW - Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
KW - Humans
KW - Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data
KW - Benchmarking
KW - Male
KW - Critical Pathways
KW - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods
KW - Europe/epidemiology
KW - Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
KW - Patient Safety
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery
KW - Female
KW - Aged
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194476872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae147
DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae147
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38554125
SN - 0195-668X
VL - 45
SP - 1904
EP - 1916
JO - European Heart Journal
JF - European Heart Journal
IS - 21
ER -