Abstract
The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; Frederick, 2005) is a frequently used measure of cognitive vs. intuitive reflection. It is also a frequently found entertaining 'test' on the Internet. In a large age-stratified community-based sample (N = 2,272), we analyzed the impact of having already performed the CRT or any similar task in the past. Indeed, we found that 44% of participants had experiences with these tasks, which was reflected in higher CRT scores (Cohen's d = 0.41). Furthermore, experienced participants were different from naïve participants in regard to their socio-demographics (younger, higher educated, fewer siblings, more likely single or in a relationship than married, having no children). The best predictors of a high CRT score were the highest educational qualification (4.62% explained variance) followed by the experience with the task (3.06%). Therefore, we suggest using more recent multi-item CRTs with newer items and a more elaborated test construction.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e2395 |
Pages (from-to) | e2395 |
Journal | PeerJ |
Volume | 4 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Age-stratified sample
- Cognitive Reflection Test
- Cognitive vs. intuitive reflection
- Dominance analysis
- Test experience
- Validity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Neuroscience
- General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences