What is a good doctor?

Verena Steiner-Hofbauer, Beate Schrank, Anita Holzinger

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift (peer-reviewed)Übersichtsartikel

46 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Changes in medical curricula have led to a shift of focus in medical education. The goal was to implement a more practical approach to teaching and thereby create better doctors. However, the question of what makes a good doctor is not easy to answer. This article gives an overview on the literature about this topic. A systematized review and narrative synthesis were conducted including 20 articles about the features of good doctors. Qualitative and quantitative studies as well as questionnaires were included. These studies reported research involving students, doctors, patients, and nurses. The resulting characteristics of good doctors fell into six categories: (1) General interpersonal qualities, (2) Communication and patient involvement, (3) Medical competence, (4) Ethics, (5) Medical management, (6) Teaching, research, and continuous education. The different stakeholders showed different ideas of the concept of a good doctor. Interestingly, patients had a stronger focus on communication skills, whereas doctors put more emphasis on medical skills. Balancing this discrepancy will be a challenge for future medical education.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)398-405
Seitenumfang8
FachzeitschriftWiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
Jahrgang168
Ausgabenummer15-16
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 01 Nov. 2018

Schlagwörter

  • Good doctor
  • Medical education
  • Systematized review

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

  • Allgemeine Medizin

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „What is a good doctor?“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren