TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards optimization of volar plate fixations of distal radius fractures
T2 - Using finite element analyses to reduce the number of screws
AU - Synek, Alexander
AU - Baumbach, Sebastian F
AU - Pahr, Dieter H
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - BACKGROUND: Using fewer distal screws in volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures could reduce treatment costs and complications. However, there is currently no consensus on the ideal screw configuration, likely due to experimental limitations and its subject-specific nature. In this study, finite element analysis was used to investigate (1) if reducing the number of screws is biomechanically feasible and (2) if an optimal screw configuration is subject-specific.METHODS: Validated subject-specific finite element models of 16 human radii with extra articular distal radius fractures and volar plate fixation with six distal screws were used as a baseline. 41 additional configurations with three to six distal screws were simulated for each subject. Axial stiffness and peri-implant strains around the distal screws were evaluated. Subject-specific optimum configurations were determined using a lower bound for the axial stiffness and minimizing peri-implant strains.FINDINGS: Even using three distal screws led to only minor deterioration of the biomechanical properties in the best configuration (axial stiffness: -11.2%, peri-implant strains: -35.0%), but a considerable deterioration in the worst configuration (axial stiffness: -46.2%, peri-implant strains: +112.4%). The optimization showed that the ideal screw configuration is subject-specific and on average 1.9 screws could be saved based on the herein used optimization criterion.INTERPRETATION: This study highlights that not only how many, but which screws are used in volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures is critical. Using a patient-specific selection of distal screws bears potential to save costs and reduce complications.
AB - BACKGROUND: Using fewer distal screws in volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures could reduce treatment costs and complications. However, there is currently no consensus on the ideal screw configuration, likely due to experimental limitations and its subject-specific nature. In this study, finite element analysis was used to investigate (1) if reducing the number of screws is biomechanically feasible and (2) if an optimal screw configuration is subject-specific.METHODS: Validated subject-specific finite element models of 16 human radii with extra articular distal radius fractures and volar plate fixation with six distal screws were used as a baseline. 41 additional configurations with three to six distal screws were simulated for each subject. Axial stiffness and peri-implant strains around the distal screws were evaluated. Subject-specific optimum configurations were determined using a lower bound for the axial stiffness and minimizing peri-implant strains.FINDINGS: Even using three distal screws led to only minor deterioration of the biomechanical properties in the best configuration (axial stiffness: -11.2%, peri-implant strains: -35.0%), but a considerable deterioration in the worst configuration (axial stiffness: -46.2%, peri-implant strains: +112.4%). The optimization showed that the ideal screw configuration is subject-specific and on average 1.9 screws could be saved based on the herein used optimization criterion.INTERPRETATION: This study highlights that not only how many, but which screws are used in volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures is critical. Using a patient-specific selection of distal screws bears potential to save costs and reduce complications.
KW - Biomechanical Phenomena
KW - Bone Screws
KW - Finite Element Analysis
KW - Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation
KW - Humans
KW - Radius Fractures/surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099620098&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105272
DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105272
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33493739
SN - 0268-0033
VL - 82
SP - 105272
JO - Clinical Biomechanics
JF - Clinical Biomechanics
M1 - 105272
ER -