Real-World Treatment Patterns and Timeliness of Clinical Care Pathway for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Austria: The PRATER Retrospective Study

Maximilian Hochmair, Angelika Terbuch, David Lang, Christian Trockenbacher, Florian Augustin, Bahil Ghanim, Dominik Maurer, Hossein Taghizadeh, Christoph Kamhuber, Robert Wurm, Jörg Lindenmann, Petra Braz, Tatjana Bundalo, Merjem Begic, Johanna Bauer, Patrick Reimann, Nino Müser, Florian Huemer, Verena Schlintl, Daniela BianconiBernhard Baumgartner, Peter Schenk, Markus Rauter, Konrad Hötzenecker

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift (peer-reviewed)Artikel in Fachzeitschrift

Abstract

This was a retrospective study of the profile and initial treatments of adults diagnosed with early-stage (ES) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during January 2018-December 2021 at 16 leading hospital institutions in Austria, excluding patients enrolled in clinical trials. In total, 319 patients were enrolled at a planned ~1:1:1 ratio across StI:II:III. Most tested biomarkers were programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1; 58% expressing), Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS; 22% positive), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; 18% positive). Of 115/98/106 StI/II/III patients, 82%/85%/36% underwent surgery, followed by systemic therapy in 9%/45%/47% of those [mostly chemotherapy (ChT)]. Unresected treated StIII patients received ChT + radiotherapy [43%; followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in 39% of those], ICI ± ChT (35%), and ChT-alone/radiotherapy-alone (22%). Treatment was initiated a median (interquartile range) of 24 (7-39) days after histological confirmation, and 55 (38-81) days after first medical visit. Based on exploratory analyses of all patients newly diagnosed with any stage NSCLC during 2018-2021 at 14 of the sites (N = 7846), 22%/10%/25%/43% had StI/II/III/IV. The total number was not significantly different between pre-COVID-19 (2018-2019) and study-specific COVID-19 (2020-2021) periods, while StI proportion increased (21% vs. 23%; p = 0.012). Small differences were noted in treatments. In conclusion, treatments were aligned with guideline recommendations at a time which preceded the era of ICIs and targeted therapies in the (neo)adjuvant setting.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer2586
FachzeitschriftCancers
Jahrgang16
Ausgabenummer14
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 19 Juli 2024

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Real-World Treatment Patterns and Timeliness of Clinical Care Pathway for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Austria: The PRATER Retrospective Study“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren