Practical clinical skills assessment for a cohort of 680 2nd year human medicine students. Is it feasible?

Michaela Wagner-Menghin, Ingrid Preusche, Michael Schmidts

    Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift (peer-reviewed)Artikel in Fachzeitschrift

    Abstract

    In clinical skills training objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are the method of choice to foster learning. Hence, implementing them is challenging and expensive. Thus it is investigated how an alternative procedure that keeps OSCE's essential elements, but assigns less stations to each student, works in terms of validity and justifiability.Data of n = 694 students, each taking five tasks drawn semi-randomized out of a pool of 26 tasks, strictly aligned with learning objectives, are analyzed. Despite unsurprisingly low overall reliability, a justifiable pass/fail decision is possible for 480 students (69 %). The remaining group (n = 210, 30 %) is indeed larger than with longer OSCEs, and would need ongoing assessment. The tasks' psychometric quality contributes to exams construct validity. Resource preserving short practical skills assessment is educationally valid and feasible with MedUniVienna's human medicine cohorts of n = 680.

    OriginalspracheEnglisch
    Seiten (von - bis)91-97
    Seitenumfang7
    FachzeitschriftWiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
    Jahrgang165
    Ausgabenummer5-6
    DOIs
    PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 01 März 2015

    Schlagwörter

    • Justifiability
    • Pass/fail decision
    • Practical assessment of clinical skills
    • Psychometric analysis

    ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

    • Allgemeine Medizin

    Fingerprint

    Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Practical clinical skills assessment for a cohort of 680 2nd year human medicine students. Is it feasible?“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

    Dieses zitieren