TY - JOUR
T1 - Pilot study
T2 - A simple CAD-based tool to detect breast cancer on MRI of the breast
AU - Bennani-Baiti, Barbara I
AU - Weber, M
AU - Bernathova, M
AU - Clauser, P
AU - Kapetas, P
AU - Pinker, K
AU - Woitek, R
AU - Helbich, T H
AU - Baltzer, Pascal T A
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - PURPOSE: This pilot-study aims to assess, whether quantitatively assessed enhancing breast tissue as a percentage of the entire breast volume can serve as an indicator of breast cancer at breast MRI and whether the contrast-agent employed affects diagnostic efficacy.MATERIALS: This retrospective IRB-approved study, included 39 consecutive patients, that underwent two subsequent breast MRI exams for suspicious findings at conventional imaging with 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenic and gadoteric acid. Two independent readers, blinded to the histopathological outcome, assessed unenhanced and early post-contrast images using computer-assisted software (Brevis, Siemens Healthcare). Diagnostic performance was statistically determined for percentage of ipsilateral voxel volume enhancement and for percentage of contralateral enhancing voxel volume subtracted from ipsilateral enhancing voxel volume after crosstabulation with the dichotomized histological outcome (benign/malignant).RESULTS: Ipsilateral enhancing voxel volume versus histopathological outcome resulted in an AUC of 0.707 and 0.687 for gadobenic acid, reader 1 and 2, respectively and in an AUC of 0.778 and 0.773 for gadoteric acid, reader 1 and 2, respectively. Accounting for background parenchymal enhancement by subtracting contralateral enhancing volume from ipsilateral enhancing voxel volume versus histolopathological outcome resulted in an AUC of 0.793 and 0.843 for gadobenic acid, reader 1 and 2, respectively and in an AUC of 0.692 and 0.662 for gadoteric acid, reader 1 and 2, respectively. Pairwise testing yielded no statistically significant difference both between readers and between contrast agents employed (p > 0.05).CONCLUSION: Our proposed CAD algorithm, which quantitatively assesses enhancing breast tissue as a percentage of the entire breast volume, allows indicating the presence of breast cancer.
AB - PURPOSE: This pilot-study aims to assess, whether quantitatively assessed enhancing breast tissue as a percentage of the entire breast volume can serve as an indicator of breast cancer at breast MRI and whether the contrast-agent employed affects diagnostic efficacy.MATERIALS: This retrospective IRB-approved study, included 39 consecutive patients, that underwent two subsequent breast MRI exams for suspicious findings at conventional imaging with 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenic and gadoteric acid. Two independent readers, blinded to the histopathological outcome, assessed unenhanced and early post-contrast images using computer-assisted software (Brevis, Siemens Healthcare). Diagnostic performance was statistically determined for percentage of ipsilateral voxel volume enhancement and for percentage of contralateral enhancing voxel volume subtracted from ipsilateral enhancing voxel volume after crosstabulation with the dichotomized histological outcome (benign/malignant).RESULTS: Ipsilateral enhancing voxel volume versus histopathological outcome resulted in an AUC of 0.707 and 0.687 for gadobenic acid, reader 1 and 2, respectively and in an AUC of 0.778 and 0.773 for gadoteric acid, reader 1 and 2, respectively. Accounting for background parenchymal enhancement by subtracting contralateral enhancing volume from ipsilateral enhancing voxel volume versus histolopathological outcome resulted in an AUC of 0.793 and 0.843 for gadobenic acid, reader 1 and 2, respectively and in an AUC of 0.692 and 0.662 for gadoteric acid, reader 1 and 2, respectively. Pairwise testing yielded no statistically significant difference both between readers and between contrast agents employed (p > 0.05).CONCLUSION: Our proposed CAD algorithm, which quantitatively assesses enhancing breast tissue as a percentage of the entire breast volume, allows indicating the presence of breast cancer.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Algorithms
KW - Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
KW - Breast/diagnostic imaging
KW - Contrast Media
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods
KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
KW - Meglumine/analogs & derivatives
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Organometallic Compounds
KW - Pilot Projects
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188999731&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mri.2024.03.011
DO - 10.1016/j.mri.2024.03.011
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38479541
SN - 0730-725X
VL - 110
SP - 1
EP - 6
JO - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
ER -