TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient-specific polyetheretherketone facial implants in a computer-aided planning workflow
AU - Guevara-Rojas, Godoberto
AU - Figl, Michael
AU - Schicho, Kurt
AU - Seemann, Rudolf
AU - Traxler, Hannes
AU - Vacariu, Apostolos
AU - Carbon, Claus-Christian
AU - Ewers, Rolf
AU - Watzinger, Franz
N1 - Funding Information:
The present study was supported by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG (grant 818041B1 ), proposed and managed by Prof DDr Schicho.
PY - 2014/9
Y1 - 2014/9
N2 - PURPOSE: In the present study, we report an innovative workflow using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) patient-specific implants for esthetic corrections in the facial region through onlay grafting. The planning includes implant design according to virtual osteotomy and generation of a subtraction volume. The implant design was refined by stepwise changing the implant geometry according to soft tissue simulations.MATERIALS AND METHODS: One patient was scanned using computed tomography. PEEK implants were interactively designed and manufactured using rapid prototyping techniques. Positioning intraoperatively was assisted by computer-aided navigation. Two months after surgery, a 3-dimensional surface model of the patient's face was generated using photogrammetry. Finally, the Hausdorff distance calculation was used to quantify the overall error, encompassing the failures in soft tissue simulation and implantation.RESULTS: The implant positioning process during surgery was satisfactory. The simulated soft tissue surface and the photogrammetry scan of the patient showed a high correspondence, especially where the skin covered the implants. The mean total error (Hausdorff distance) was 0.81 ± 1.00 mm (median 0.48, interquartile range 1.11). The spatial deviation remained less than 0.7 mm for the vast majority of points.CONCLUSIONS: The proposed workflow provides a complete computer-aided design, computer-aided manufacturing, and computer-aided surgery chain for implant design, allowing for soft tissue simulation, fabrication of patient-specific implants, and image-guided surgery to position the implants. Much of the surgical complexity resulting from osteotomies of the zygoma, chin, or mandibular angle might be transferred into the planning phase of patient-specific implants.
AB - PURPOSE: In the present study, we report an innovative workflow using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) patient-specific implants for esthetic corrections in the facial region through onlay grafting. The planning includes implant design according to virtual osteotomy and generation of a subtraction volume. The implant design was refined by stepwise changing the implant geometry according to soft tissue simulations.MATERIALS AND METHODS: One patient was scanned using computed tomography. PEEK implants were interactively designed and manufactured using rapid prototyping techniques. Positioning intraoperatively was assisted by computer-aided navigation. Two months after surgery, a 3-dimensional surface model of the patient's face was generated using photogrammetry. Finally, the Hausdorff distance calculation was used to quantify the overall error, encompassing the failures in soft tissue simulation and implantation.RESULTS: The implant positioning process during surgery was satisfactory. The simulated soft tissue surface and the photogrammetry scan of the patient showed a high correspondence, especially where the skin covered the implants. The mean total error (Hausdorff distance) was 0.81 ± 1.00 mm (median 0.48, interquartile range 1.11). The spatial deviation remained less than 0.7 mm for the vast majority of points.CONCLUSIONS: The proposed workflow provides a complete computer-aided design, computer-aided manufacturing, and computer-aided surgery chain for implant design, allowing for soft tissue simulation, fabrication of patient-specific implants, and image-guided surgery to position the implants. Much of the surgical complexity resulting from osteotomies of the zygoma, chin, or mandibular angle might be transferred into the planning phase of patient-specific implants.
KW - Adult
KW - Benzophenones
KW - Biocompatible Materials
KW - Computer-Aided Design
KW - Face/anatomy & histology
KW - Facial Bones/surgery
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods
KW - Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods
KW - Ketones
KW - Models, Anatomic
KW - Osteotomy/methods
KW - Patient Care Planning
KW - Photogrammetry/methods
KW - Polyethylene Glycols
KW - Polymers
KW - Prostheses and Implants
KW - Prosthesis Design
KW - Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods
KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
KW - User-Computer Interface
KW - Zygoma/abnormalities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906315611&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.joms.2014.02.013
DO - 10.1016/j.joms.2014.02.013
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 24679957
SN - 0278-2391
VL - 72
SP - 1801
EP - 1812
JO - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 9
ER -