TY - JOUR
T1 - No increase in toxicity of pelvic irradiation when intensity modulation is employed
T2 - clinical and dosimetric data of 208 patients treated with post-prostatectomy radiotherapy
AU - Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara A
AU - Ciardo, Delia
AU - Ferrario, Silvia
AU - Fossati, Piero
AU - Fanetti, Giuseppe
AU - Zerini, Dario
AU - Zannoni, Davide
AU - Fodor, Cristiana
AU - Gerardi, Marianna A
AU - Surgo, Alessia
AU - Muto, Matteo
AU - Cambria, Raffaella
AU - De Cobelli, Ottavio
AU - Orecchia, Roberto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Authors.
PY - 2016/7
Y1 - 2016/7
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare the toxicity of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) to the pelvis or prostate bed (PB) only. To test the hypothesis that the potentially injurious effect of pelvic irradiation can be counterbalanced by reduced irradiated normal tissue volume using IG-IMRT.METHODS: Between February 2010 and February 2012, 208 patients with prostate cancer were treated with adjuvant or salvage IG-IMRT to the PB (102 patients, Group PB) or the pelvis and prostate bed (P) (106 patients, Group P). The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria were used to evaluate toxicity.RESULTS: Median follow-up was 27 months. Toxicity G ≥ 2 in Group PB: in the bowel acute and late toxicities were 11.8% and 10%, respectively; urinary acute and late toxicities were 10.8% and 15%, respectively. Toxicity G ≥ 2 in Group P: in the bowel acute and late toxicities were both 13.2%; urinary acute and late toxicities were 13.2% and 15.1%, respectively. No statistical difference in acute or late toxicity between the groups was found (bowel: p = 0.23 and p = 0.89 for acute and late toxicity, respectively; urinary: p = 0.39 and p = 0.66 for acute and late toxicity, respectively). Of the clinical variables, only previous abdominal surgery was correlated with acute bowel toxicity. Dosimetric parameters that correlated with bowel toxicity were identified.CONCLUSION: The toxicity rates were low and similar in both groups, suggesting that IG-IMRT allows for a safe post-operative irradiation of larger volumes. Further investigation is warranted to exclude bias owing to non-randomized character of the study.ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Our report shows that modern radiotherapy technology and careful planning allow maintaining the toxicity of pelvic lymph node treatment at the acceptable level, as it is in the case of PB radiotherapy.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare the toxicity of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) to the pelvis or prostate bed (PB) only. To test the hypothesis that the potentially injurious effect of pelvic irradiation can be counterbalanced by reduced irradiated normal tissue volume using IG-IMRT.METHODS: Between February 2010 and February 2012, 208 patients with prostate cancer were treated with adjuvant or salvage IG-IMRT to the PB (102 patients, Group PB) or the pelvis and prostate bed (P) (106 patients, Group P). The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria were used to evaluate toxicity.RESULTS: Median follow-up was 27 months. Toxicity G ≥ 2 in Group PB: in the bowel acute and late toxicities were 11.8% and 10%, respectively; urinary acute and late toxicities were 10.8% and 15%, respectively. Toxicity G ≥ 2 in Group P: in the bowel acute and late toxicities were both 13.2%; urinary acute and late toxicities were 13.2% and 15.1%, respectively. No statistical difference in acute or late toxicity between the groups was found (bowel: p = 0.23 and p = 0.89 for acute and late toxicity, respectively; urinary: p = 0.39 and p = 0.66 for acute and late toxicity, respectively). Of the clinical variables, only previous abdominal surgery was correlated with acute bowel toxicity. Dosimetric parameters that correlated with bowel toxicity were identified.CONCLUSION: The toxicity rates were low and similar in both groups, suggesting that IG-IMRT allows for a safe post-operative irradiation of larger volumes. Further investigation is warranted to exclude bias owing to non-randomized character of the study.ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Our report shows that modern radiotherapy technology and careful planning allow maintaining the toxicity of pelvic lymph node treatment at the acceptable level, as it is in the case of PB radiotherapy.
KW - Aged
KW - Follow-Up Studies
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Pelvis/pathology
KW - Prostate/radiation effects
KW - Prostatectomy
KW - Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy
KW - Radiation Injuries/prevention & control
KW - Radiotherapy Dosage
KW - Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects
KW - Retrospective Studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989338208&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1259/bjr.20150985
DO - 10.1259/bjr.20150985
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 27109736
SN - 0007-1285
VL - 89
SP - 20150985
JO - British Journal of Radiology
JF - British Journal of Radiology
IS - 1063
M1 - 20150985
ER -