TY - JOUR
T1 - New onset of depression in aging women and men
T2 - contributions of social, psychological, behavioral, and somatic predictors in the community
AU - Beutel, Manfred E
AU - Brähler, Elmar
AU - Wiltink, Joerg
AU - Kerahrodi, Jasmin Ghaemi
AU - Burghardt, Juliane
AU - Michal, Matthias
AU - Schulz, Andreas
AU - Wild, Phillipp S
AU - Münzel, Thomas
AU - Schmidtmann, Irene
AU - Lackner, Karl J
AU - Pfeiffer, Norbert
AU - Borta, Andreas
AU - Tibubos, Ana N
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Cambridge University Press.
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Based on the vulnerability-stress model, we aimed to (1) determine new onset of depression in individuals who had not shown evidence of depression at baseline (5 years earlier) and (2) identify social, psychological, behavioral, and somatic predictors.METHODS: Longitudinal data of N = 10 036 participants (40-79 years) were evaluated who had no evidence of depression at baseline based on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), no history of depression, or intake of antidepressants. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to predict the onset of depression.RESULTS: Prevalence of new cases of depression was 4.4%. Higher rates of women (5.1%) than men (3.8%) were due to their excess incidence <60 years of age. Regression analyses revealed significant social, psychological, behavioral, and somatic predictors: loneliness [odds ratio (OR) 2.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48-2.71], generalized anxiety (OR 2.65; 1.79-3.85), social phobia (OR 1.87; 1.34-2.57), panic (OR 1.67; 1.01-2.64), type D personality (OR 1.85; 1.47-2.32), smoking (OR 1.35; 1.05-1.71), and comorbid cancer (OR 1.58; 1.09-2.24). Protective factors were age (OR 0.88; 0.83-0.93) and social support (OR 0.93; 0.90-0.95). Stratified by sex, cancer was predictive for women; for men smoking and life events. Entered additionally, the PHQ-9 baseline score was strongly predictive (OR 1.40; 1.34-1.47), generalized anxiety became only marginally, and panic was no longer predictive. Other predictors remained significant, albeit weaker.CONCLUSIONS: Psychobiological vulnerability, stress, and illness-related factors were predictive of new onset of depression, whereas social support was protective. Baseline subclinical depression was an additional risk weakening the relationship between anxiety and depression by taking their overlap into account. Vulnerability factors differed between men and women.
AB - BACKGROUND: Based on the vulnerability-stress model, we aimed to (1) determine new onset of depression in individuals who had not shown evidence of depression at baseline (5 years earlier) and (2) identify social, psychological, behavioral, and somatic predictors.METHODS: Longitudinal data of N = 10 036 participants (40-79 years) were evaluated who had no evidence of depression at baseline based on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), no history of depression, or intake of antidepressants. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to predict the onset of depression.RESULTS: Prevalence of new cases of depression was 4.4%. Higher rates of women (5.1%) than men (3.8%) were due to their excess incidence <60 years of age. Regression analyses revealed significant social, psychological, behavioral, and somatic predictors: loneliness [odds ratio (OR) 2.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48-2.71], generalized anxiety (OR 2.65; 1.79-3.85), social phobia (OR 1.87; 1.34-2.57), panic (OR 1.67; 1.01-2.64), type D personality (OR 1.85; 1.47-2.32), smoking (OR 1.35; 1.05-1.71), and comorbid cancer (OR 1.58; 1.09-2.24). Protective factors were age (OR 0.88; 0.83-0.93) and social support (OR 0.93; 0.90-0.95). Stratified by sex, cancer was predictive for women; for men smoking and life events. Entered additionally, the PHQ-9 baseline score was strongly predictive (OR 1.40; 1.34-1.47), generalized anxiety became only marginally, and panic was no longer predictive. Other predictors remained significant, albeit weaker.CONCLUSIONS: Psychobiological vulnerability, stress, and illness-related factors were predictive of new onset of depression, whereas social support was protective. Baseline subclinical depression was an additional risk weakening the relationship between anxiety and depression by taking their overlap into account. Vulnerability factors differed between men and women.
KW - Adaptation, Psychological
KW - Aging/psychology
KW - Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis
KW - Correlation of Data
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Depressive Disorder/diagnosis
KW - Female
KW - Germany
KW - Health Status
KW - Humans
KW - Incidence
KW - Independent Living/psychology
KW - Longitudinal Studies
KW - Male
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Social Behavior
KW - Social Environment
KW - gender
KW - vulnerability-stress model
KW - onset of depression
KW - Community
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85052649552
U2 - 10.1017/S0033291718001848
DO - 10.1017/S0033291718001848
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 30131081
SN - 0033-2917
VL - 49
SP - 1148
EP - 1155
JO - Psychological Medicine
JF - Psychological Medicine
IS - 7
ER -