Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Mixed-beam approach in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: IMRT followed by proton therapy boost versus IMRT-only. Evaluation of toxicity and efficacy

  • Daniela Alterio
  • , Emma D’Ippolito*
  • , Barbara Vischioni
  • , Piero Fossati
  • , Sara Gandini
  • , Maria Bonora
  • , Sara Ronchi
  • , Viviana Vitolo
  • , Edoardo Mastella
  • , Giuseppe Magro
  • , Pierfrancesco Franco
  • , Umberto Ricardi
  • , Marco Krengli
  • , Giovanni Ivaldi
  • , Annamaria Ferrari
  • , Giuseppi Fanetti
  • , Stefania Comi
  • , Marta Tagliabue
  • , Elena Verri
  • , Rosalinda Ricotti
  • Delia Ciardo, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa, Francesca Valvo, Roberto Orecchia
*Korrespondierende:r Autor:in für diese Arbeit

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift (peer-reviewed)Artikel in Fachzeitschrift

Abstract

Objective: To compare radiation-induced toxicity and dosimetry parameters in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LANPC) treated with a mixed-beam (MB) approach (IMRT followed by proton therapy boost) with an historic cohort of patients treated with a full course of IMRT-only. Material and methods: Twenty-seven patients with LANPC treated with the MB approach were compared to a similar cohort of 17 patients treated with IMRT-only. The MB approach consisted in a first phase of IMRT up to 54–60 Gy followed by a second phase delivered with a proton therapy boost up to 70–74 Gy (RBE). The total dose for patients treated with IMRT-only was 69.96 Gy. Induction chemotherapy was administrated to 59 and 88% and concurrent chemoradiotherapy to 88 and 100% of the MB and IMRT-only patients, respectively. The worst toxicity occurring during the entire course of treatment (acute toxicity) and early-late toxicity were registered according to the Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events V4.03. Results: The two cohorts were comparable. Patients treated with MB received a significantly higher median total dose to target volumes (p =.02). Acute grade 3 mucositis was found in 11 and 76% (p =.0002) of patients treated with MB and IMRT-only approach, respectively, while grade 2 xerostomia was found in 7 and 35% (p =.02) of patients treated with MB and IMRT-only, respectively. There was no statistical difference in late toxicity. Local progression-free survival (PFS) and progression-free survival curves were similar between the two cohorts of patients (p =.17 and p =.40, respectively). Local control rate was 96% and 81% for patients treated with MB approach and IMRT-only, respectively. Conclusions: Sequential MB approach for LANPC patients provides a significantly lower acute toxicity profile compared to full course of IMRT. There were no differences in early-late morbidities and disease-related outcomes (censored at two-years) but a longer follow-up is required to achieve conclusive results.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)541-548
Seitenumfang8
FachzeitschriftActa Oncologica
Jahrgang59
Ausgabenummer5
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 03 Mai 2020
Extern publiziertJa

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

  • Hämatologie
  • Onkologie
  • Radiologie, Nuklearmedizin und Bildgebung

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Mixed-beam approach in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: IMRT followed by proton therapy boost versus IMRT-only. Evaluation of toxicity and efficacy“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren