Methodical Bias, Incorrect Use of the RADNER Reading Charts, and Avoiding Misleading Reporting in Visual Acuity Measurements in Kortuem C, Marx T, Altpeter E, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Kuester-Gruber S. Comparing Reading Speeds for Reading Standardized Single Sentences and Paragraphs in Patients with Maculopathy. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(3):512-22

Wolfgang Radner; Kristel Maaijwee; Marc D de Smet; Thomas Benesch; Armin Ettl

doi:10.1159/000520029

Methodical Bias, Incorrect Use of the RADNER Reading Charts, and Avoiding Misleading Reporting in Visual Acuity Measurements in Kortuem C, Marx T, Altpeter E, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Kuester-Gruber S. Comparing Reading Speeds for Reading Standardized Single Sentences and Paragraphs in Patients with Maculopathy. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(3):512-22

Wolfgang Radner, Kristel Maaijwee, Marc D de Smet, Thomas Benesch, Armin Ettl

Klinische Abteilung für Augenheilkunde und Orbitachirurgie (Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten)

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift (peer-reviewed) › Brief/kurzer Abriss

Originalsprache	Englisch
Seiten (von - bis)	239-243
Seitenumfang	5
Fachzeitschrift	Ophthalmic Research
Jahrgang	65
Ausgabenummer	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1159/000520029
Publikationsstatus	Veröffentlicht - 06 Apr. 2022

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Sensorische Systeme
Zelluläre und Molekulare Neurowissenschaften
Ophthalmologie

Zugriff auf Dokument

10.1159/000520029

Andere Dateien und Links

Verknüpfung zur Publikation in Scopus

Dieses zitieren

Radner, W., Maaijwee, K., de Smet, M. D., Benesch, T., & Ettl, A. (2022). Methodical Bias, Incorrect Use of the RADNER Reading Charts, and Avoiding Misleading Reporting in Visual Acuity Measurements in Kortuem C, Marx T, Altpeter E, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Kuester-Gruber S. Comparing Reading Speeds for Reading Standardized Single Sentences and Paragraphs in Patients with Maculopathy. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(3):512-22. Ophthalmic Research, 65(2), 239-243. https://doi.org/10.1159/000520029

Radner, Wolfgang ; Maaijwee, Kristel ; de Smet, Marc D et al. / Methodical Bias, Incorrect Use of the RADNER Reading Charts, and Avoiding Misleading Reporting in Visual Acuity Measurements in Kortuem C, Marx T, Altpeter E, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Kuester-Gruber S. Comparing Reading Speeds for Reading Standardized Single Sentences and Paragraphs in Patients with Maculopathy. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(3):512-22. in: Ophthalmic Research. 2022 ; Jahrgang 65, Nr. 2. S. 239-243.

@article{dfe53e6bd552437196e4068b84c142ec,

title = "Methodical Bias, Incorrect Use of the RADNER Reading Charts, and Avoiding Misleading Reporting in Visual Acuity Measurements in Kortuem C, Marx T, Altpeter E, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Kuester-Gruber S. Comparing Reading Speeds for Reading Standardized Single Sentences and Paragraphs in Patients with Maculopathy. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(3):512-22",

keywords = "Humans, Language, Macular Degeneration, Reading, Visual Acuity",

author = "Wolfgang Radner and Kristel Maaijwee and {de Smet}, {Marc D} and Thomas Benesch and Armin Ettl",

year = "2022",

month = apr,

day = "6",

doi = "10.1159/000520029",

language = "English",

volume = "65",

pages = "239--243",

journal = "Ophthalmic Research",

issn = "0030-3747",

publisher = "S. Karger AG",

number = "2",

}

Radner, W, Maaijwee, K, de Smet, MD, Benesch, T & Ettl, A 2022, 'Methodical Bias, Incorrect Use of the RADNER Reading Charts, and Avoiding Misleading Reporting in Visual Acuity Measurements in Kortuem C, Marx T, Altpeter E, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Kuester-Gruber S. Comparing Reading Speeds for Reading Standardized Single Sentences and Paragraphs in Patients with Maculopathy. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(3):512-22', Ophthalmic Research, Jg. 65, Nr. 2, S. 239-243. https://doi.org/10.1159/000520029

Methodical Bias, Incorrect Use of the RADNER Reading Charts, and Avoiding Misleading Reporting in Visual Acuity Measurements in Kortuem C, Marx T, Altpeter E, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Kuester-Gruber S. Comparing Reading Speeds for Reading Standardized Single Sentences and Paragraphs in Patients with Maculopathy. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(3):512-22. / Radner, Wolfgang; Maaijwee, Kristel; de Smet, Marc D et al.
in: Ophthalmic Research, Jahrgang 65, Nr. 2, 06.04.2022, S. 239-243.

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift (peer-reviewed) › Brief/kurzer Abriss

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodical Bias, Incorrect Use of the RADNER Reading Charts, and Avoiding Misleading Reporting in Visual Acuity Measurements in Kortuem C, Marx T, Altpeter E, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Kuester-Gruber S. Comparing Reading Speeds for Reading Standardized Single Sentences and Paragraphs in Patients with Maculopathy. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(3):512-22

AU - Radner, Wolfgang

AU - Maaijwee, Kristel

AU - de Smet, Marc D

AU - Benesch, Thomas

AU - Ettl, Armin

PY - 2022/4/6

Y1 - 2022/4/6

KW - Humans

KW - Language

KW - Macular Degeneration

KW - Reading

KW - Visual Acuity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129321515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000520029

DO - 10.1159/000520029

M3 - Letter/short communication

C2 - 34614500

SN - 0030-3747

VL - 65

SP - 239

EP - 243

JO - Ophthalmic Research

JF - Ophthalmic Research

IS - 2

ER -

Radner W, Maaijwee K, de Smet MD, Benesch T, Ettl A. Methodical Bias, Incorrect Use of the RADNER Reading Charts, and Avoiding Misleading Reporting in Visual Acuity Measurements in Kortuem C, Marx T, Altpeter E, Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Kuester-Gruber S. Comparing Reading Speeds for Reading Standardized Single Sentences and Paragraphs in Patients with Maculopathy. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(3):512-22. Ophthalmic Research. 2022 Apr 6;65(2):239-243. doi: 10.1159/000520029