Lunar Lies: The Impact of Informational Framing and Individual Differences in Shaping Conspiracist Beliefs About the Moon Landings

Viren Swami*, Jakob Pietschnig, Ulrich S. Tran, Ingo W. Nader, Stefan Stieger, Martin Voracek

*Korrespondierende:r Autor:in für diese Arbeit

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift (peer-reviewed)Artikel in Fachzeitschrift

105 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Two studies examined the role of informational framing and individual differences on acceptance of the moon landings conspiracy theory (CT). In Study 1, participants were randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups in which they were exposed to different forms of information about the moon landings CT. Results showed that information critical of the moon landings CT resulted in attenuated conspiracist beliefs and that information supportive of the CT resulted in stronger conspiracist beliefs. In addition, stronger belief in the moon landings CT was associated with participants' belief in other CTs and openness to experience. In Study 2, participants completed a survey measuring their belief in the moon landings CT and a range of individual difference factors. Results showed that acceptance of the moon landings CT was associated with the adoption of a conspiracist worldview and schizotypal tendencies. Possibilities for conceptualizing the functional roles played by CTs are discussed.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)71-80
Seitenumfang10
FachzeitschriftApplied Cognitive Psychology
Jahrgang27
Ausgabenummer1
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Jan. 2013
Extern publiziertJa

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

  • Experimentelle und kognitive Psychologie
  • Pädagogische und Entwicklungspsychologie
  • Geisteswissenschaftliche Fächer (sonstige)

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Lunar Lies: The Impact of Informational Framing and Individual Differences in Shaping Conspiracist Beliefs About the Moon Landings“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren