TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of organ shape variations on margin concepts for cervix cancer ART
AU - Seppenwoolde, Yvette
AU - Stock, Markus
AU - Buschmann, Martin
AU - Georg, Dietmar
AU - Bauer-Novotny, Kwei-Yuang
AU - Pötter, Richard
AU - Georg, Petra
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Target and organ movement motivate adaptive radiotherapy for cervix cancer patients. We investigated the dosimetric impact of margin concepts with different levels of complexity on both organ at risk (OAR) sparing and PTV coverage.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Weekly CT and daily CBCT scans were delineated for 10 patients. The dosimetric impact of organ shape variations were evaluated for four (isotropic) margin concepts: two static PTVs (PTV6mm and PTV15mm), a PTV based on ITV of the planning CT and CBCTs of the first treatment week (PTVART ITV) and an adaptive PTV based on a library approach (PTVART Library).RESULTS: Using static concepts, OAR doses increased with large margins, while smaller margins compromised target coverage. ART PTVs resulted in comparable target coverage and better sparing of bladder (V40Gy: 15% and 7% less), rectum (V40Gy: 18 and 6cc less) and bowel (V40Gy: 106 and 15cc less) compared to PTV15mm. Target coverage evaluation showed that for elective fields a static 5mm margin sufficed.CONCLUSION: PTVART Library achieved the best dosimetric results. However when weighing clinical benefit against workload, ITV margins based on repetitive movement evaluation during the first week also provide improvements over static margin concepts.
AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Target and organ movement motivate adaptive radiotherapy for cervix cancer patients. We investigated the dosimetric impact of margin concepts with different levels of complexity on both organ at risk (OAR) sparing and PTV coverage.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Weekly CT and daily CBCT scans were delineated for 10 patients. The dosimetric impact of organ shape variations were evaluated for four (isotropic) margin concepts: two static PTVs (PTV6mm and PTV15mm), a PTV based on ITV of the planning CT and CBCTs of the first treatment week (PTVART ITV) and an adaptive PTV based on a library approach (PTVART Library).RESULTS: Using static concepts, OAR doses increased with large margins, while smaller margins compromised target coverage. ART PTVs resulted in comparable target coverage and better sparing of bladder (V40Gy: 15% and 7% less), rectum (V40Gy: 18 and 6cc less) and bowel (V40Gy: 106 and 15cc less) compared to PTV15mm. Target coverage evaluation showed that for elective fields a static 5mm margin sufficed.CONCLUSION: PTVART Library achieved the best dosimetric results. However when weighing clinical benefit against workload, ITV margins based on repetitive movement evaluation during the first week also provide improvements over static margin concepts.
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Movement
KW - Organ Sparing Treatments/methods
KW - Organs at Risk/radiation effects
KW - Radiation Dosage
KW - Radiometry/methods
KW - Radiotherapy Dosage
KW - Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods
KW - Rectum/radiation effects
KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed
KW - Urinary Bladder/diagnostic imaging
KW - Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
KW - Uterus/diagnostic imaging
KW - Workload
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992159424&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.004
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.004
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 27528119
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 120
SP - 526
EP - 531
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
IS - 3
ER -