@article{dbdbf540a33d4184aed5386562220bb7,
title = "How intelligent is a cephalopod?: Lessons from comparative cognition",
abstract = "The soft-bodied cephalopods including octopus, cuttlefish, and squid are broadly considered to be the most cognitively advanced group of invertebrates. Previous research has demonstrated that these large-brained molluscs possess a suite of cognitive attributes that are comparable to those found in some vertebrates, including highly developed perception, learning, and memory abilities. Cephalopods are also renowned for performing sophisticated feats of flexible behaviour, which have led to claims of complex cognition such as causal reasoning, future planning, and mental attribution. Hypotheses to explain why complex cognition might have emerged in cephalopods suggest that a combination of predation, foraging, and competitive pressures are likely to have driven cognitive complexity in this group of animals. Currently, it is difficult to gauge the extent to which cephalopod behaviours are underpinned by complex cognition because many of the recent claims are largely based on anecdotal evidence. In this review, we provide a general overview of cephalopod cognition with a particular focus on the cognitive attributes that are thought to be prerequisites for more complex cognitive abilities. We then discuss different types of behavioural flexibility exhibited by cephalopods and, using examples from other taxa, highlight that behavioural flexibility could be explained by putatively simpler mechanisms. Consequently, behavioural flexibility should not be used as evidence of complex cognition. Fortunately, the field of comparative cognition centres on designing methods to pinpoint the underlying mechanisms that drive behaviours. To illustrate the utility of the methods developed in comparative cognition research, we provide a series of experimental designs aimed at distinguishing between complex cognition and simpler alternative explanations. Finally, we discuss the advantages of using cephalopods to develop a more comprehensive reconstruction of cognitive evolution.",
keywords = "Animals, Brain, Cephalopoda, Cognition, Decapodiformes, Learning, octopus, complex cognition, cuttlefish, cognitive evolution, cognitive mechanisms, convergent evolution, squid",
author = "Schnell, {Alexandra K} and Piero Amodio and Markus Boeckle and Clayton, {Nicola S}",
note = "Funding Information: Many thanks to the funding bodies that supported the authors during the conception, development and writing of this review. A.K.S. was supported by an Endeavour Research Fellowship funded by the Australian Government and was also supported by a Newton International Fellowship funded by the Royal Society. P.A. received support from the Cambridge Philosophical Society (Research Studentship Ref. 123 S52/002/19). A European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007‐2013)/ERC Grant Agreement No. 3399933 was awarded to N.S.C., which supported both M.B and N.S.C. Many thanks are also due to Dr William Foster, Dr R.T. Hanlon, and an anonymous reviewer for valuable feedback as well as D. MacFarlane for helpful discussions. Massimo Capodicasa and Professor Peter Godfrey‐Smith are acknowledged for generously granting permission to use their images. Funding Information: Many thanks to the funding bodies that supported the authors during the conception, development and writing of this review. A.K.S. was supported by an Endeavour Research Fellowship funded by the Australian Government and was also supported by a Newton International Fellowship funded by the Royal Society. P.A. received support from the Cambridge Philosophical Society (Research Studentship Ref. 123 S52/002/19). A European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement No. 3399933 was awarded to N.S.C., which supported both M.B and N.S.C. Many thanks are also due to Dr William Foster, Dr R.T. Hanlon, and an anonymous reviewer for valuable feedback as well as D. MacFarlane for helpful discussions. Massimo Capodicasa and Professor Peter Godfrey-Smith are acknowledged for generously granting permission to use their images. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society.",
year = "2021",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1111/brv.12651",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "162--178",
journal = "Biological Reviews",
issn = "1464-7931",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",
}