TY - JOUR
T1 - Extracorporeal Life Support for Post-Cardiotomy Acute Right Ventricular Failure
T2 - a Retrospective Observational Multicenter Study
AU - PELS-1 Investigators
AU - Bianchi, Giacomo
AU - Perazzo, Alvaro
AU - Mariani, Silvia
AU - van Bussel, Bas C T
AU - Di Mauro, Michele
AU - Wiedeman, Dominik
AU - Saeed, Diyar
AU - Pozzi, Matteo
AU - Botta, Luca
AU - Boeken, Udo
AU - Samalavicius, Robertas
AU - Bounader, Karl
AU - Hou, Xiaotong
AU - Bunge, Jeroen J H
AU - Buscher, Hergen
AU - Salazar, Leonardo
AU - Meyns, Bart
AU - Mazzeffi, Michael A
AU - Matteucci, Sacha
AU - Sponga, Sandro
AU - Ramanathan, Kollengode
AU - Russo, Claudio Francesco
AU - Formica, Francesco
AU - Sakiyalak, Pranya
AU - Fiore, Antonio
AU - Camboni, Daniele
AU - Raffa, Giuseppe Maria
AU - Diaz, Rodrigo
AU - Wang, I-Wen
AU - Jung, Jae-Seung
AU - Belohlavek, Jan
AU - Pellegrino, Vin
AU - Pettinari, Matteo
AU - Barbone, Alessandro
AU - Gaiotto, Fabio Antonio
AU - Garcia, José P
AU - Shekar, Kiran
AU - Whitman, Glenn
AU - Solinas, Marco
AU - Lorusso, Roberto
AU - Heuts, Samuel
AU - Schaefer, Anne-Kristin
AU - Conci, Luca
AU - Khalil, Jawad
AU - Lehmann, Sven
AU - Obadia, Jean-Francois
AU - Loforte, Antonio
AU - Pacini, Davide
AU - Kalampokas, Nikolaos
AU - Jankuviene, Agne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
PY - 2026/8
Y1 - 2026/8
N2 - Background Post-cardiotomy acute right ventricular failure (aRVF) constitutes a complex clinical challenge that might necessitate escalating interventions, including extracorporeal life support (ECLS). This study evaluated outcomes of adults requiring ECLS for post-cardiotomy aRVF compared with other post-cardiotomy indications. Methods In this multicenter, international, retrospective study, we analyzed patients undergoing post-cardiotomy ECLS from January 2000 to December 2020 and compared patients’ characteristics and in-hospital mortality between aRVF and other indications. Results Of 2010 patients, 240 (12%) had aRVF and 1770 (88%) had other indications for ECLS. Demographics were similar between groups; median age was 65 (55-72) years ( P = .217), and 60% were male ( P = .675). The aRVF group showed higher preoperative right-sided cardiac dysfunction, including preexisting right ventricular failure (aRVF, 22%; other indications, 8%; P < .001) and biventricular failure (aRVF, 12%; other indications, 7%; P = .013). Patients with aRVF more frequently underwent tricuspid valve surgery (aRVF, 20%; other indications, 13%; P = .003) and aortic root procedures (aRVF, 24%; other indications, 13%). They also required longer ECLS support (aRVF, 135 [70-221] hours; other indications, 116 [58-192] hours; P = .025) and longer intensive care unit stay (aRVF, 15 [7-29] days; other indications, 13 [6-25] days; P = .042). Despite more complications, including nonsurgical bleeding (aRVF, 31%; other indications, 25%; P = .042) and persistent right-sided heart failure (aRVF, 50%; other indications, 17%; P < .001), both in-hospital survival (aRVF, 59%; other indications, 61%; P = .526) and long-term survival were comparable (log-rank P = .17). Conclusions Patients requiring ECLS for post-cardiotomy aRVF, despite higher preoperative risks and complex clinical courses, achieve survival rates comparable to those of patients with other indications.
AB - Background Post-cardiotomy acute right ventricular failure (aRVF) constitutes a complex clinical challenge that might necessitate escalating interventions, including extracorporeal life support (ECLS). This study evaluated outcomes of adults requiring ECLS for post-cardiotomy aRVF compared with other post-cardiotomy indications. Methods In this multicenter, international, retrospective study, we analyzed patients undergoing post-cardiotomy ECLS from January 2000 to December 2020 and compared patients’ characteristics and in-hospital mortality between aRVF and other indications. Results Of 2010 patients, 240 (12%) had aRVF and 1770 (88%) had other indications for ECLS. Demographics were similar between groups; median age was 65 (55-72) years ( P = .217), and 60% were male ( P = .675). The aRVF group showed higher preoperative right-sided cardiac dysfunction, including preexisting right ventricular failure (aRVF, 22%; other indications, 8%; P < .001) and biventricular failure (aRVF, 12%; other indications, 7%; P = .013). Patients with aRVF more frequently underwent tricuspid valve surgery (aRVF, 20%; other indications, 13%; P = .003) and aortic root procedures (aRVF, 24%; other indications, 13%). They also required longer ECLS support (aRVF, 135 [70-221] hours; other indications, 116 [58-192] hours; P = .025) and longer intensive care unit stay (aRVF, 15 [7-29] days; other indications, 13 [6-25] days; P = .042). Despite more complications, including nonsurgical bleeding (aRVF, 31%; other indications, 25%; P = .042) and persistent right-sided heart failure (aRVF, 50%; other indications, 17%; P < .001), both in-hospital survival (aRVF, 59%; other indications, 61%; P = .526) and long-term survival were comparable (log-rank P = .17). Conclusions Patients requiring ECLS for post-cardiotomy aRVF, despite higher preoperative risks and complex clinical courses, achieve survival rates comparable to those of patients with other indications.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105035534050
U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2026.02.033
DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2026.02.033
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41833792
SN - 0003-4975
VL - 122
SP - 462
EP - 472
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
IS - 2
ER -