TY - JOUR
T1 - Dogmas, challenges, and promises in phase III allergen immunotherapy studies
AU - De Kam, Pieter-Jan
AU - Kramer, Matthias F
AU - Shamji, Mohamed H
AU - Oluwayi, Kemi
AU - Heath, Matthew D
AU - Jensen-Jarolim, Erika
AU - Berger, Markus H
AU - Berger, Uwe E
AU - Graessel, Anke
AU - Sellwood, Fiona
AU - Zielen, Stefan
AU - Vogelberg, Christian
AU - Zieglmayer, Petra
AU - Mösges, Ralph
AU - Klimek, Ludger
AU - DuBuske, Lawrence M
AU - Shreffler, Wayne G
AU - Bernstein, Jonathan A
AU - Kündig, Thomas M
AU - Skinner, Murray A
N1 - Funding Information:
PJDK, MFK, KO, MDH, AG, FS and MAS are employees of Allergy Therapeutics Plc / Bencard Allergie GmbH. EJJ reports and Inventor on EP2894478; “LCN2 as a tool for allergy diagnostic and therapy”, EP 14150965.3, Year: 01/2014; US 14/204,570, owned by Biomedical International 458 R+D GmbH, Vienna, Austria, where she is shareholder. She received honoraries for lectures from Bencard Allergy AG, Germany and Allergy Therapeutics, UK, Vifor Pharma, Meda, Novartis, Sanofi. SZ reports grants and personal fees from Allergy Therapeutics, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from bene-Arzneimittel GmbH, grants from ALK Arzneimittel, personal fees from Novartis GmbH, Böhringer Ingelheim, Lofarma GmbH, IMS HEALTH GmbH & Co. OHG, GSK, Stallergenes, Procter and Gamble, Allergopharma GmbH, AstraZeneca, Sanofi/Pasteur, and Aimmune, outside the submitted work. CV reports personal fees from Allergy Therapeutics, Bencard Allergie, grants and personal fees from Allergopharma, personal fees from HAL Allergy, Stallergenes Greer, Novartis Pharma, LETI Pharma, grants and personal fees from DBV Technology, personal fees from Aimmune, Sanofi Aventis outside the submitted work. PZ reports grants and personal fees from ALK Abello, personal fees from Allergopharma, Bencard, HAL, LETI, Meda, grants and personal fees from Marinomed, personal fees from Merck, Novartis, Sigmapharm, Stallergenes, ThermoFisher Scientific outside the submitted work. RM reports personal fees from ALK, grants from ASIT biotech, personal fees from Allergopharma, Allergy Therapeutics, grants and personal fees from Bencard, grants from Leti, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Lofarma , non-financial support from Roxall , grants and personal fees from Stallergenes, grants from Optima, personal fees from Friulchem, personal fees from Hexal, Servier, Klosterfrau, non-financial support from Atmos, personal fees from Bayer, non-financial support from Bionorica, personal fees from FAES, GSK, MSD, Johnson&Johnson, Meda, personal fees and non-financial support from Novartis , non-financial support from Otonomy , personal fees from Stada, and UCB, non-financial support from Ferrero , grants from BitopAG, Hulka, personal fees from Nuvo, grants from Ursapharm, personal fees from Menarini, Mundipharma, Pohl-Boskamp, grants from Inmunotek outside the submitted work. LK reports grants and personal fees from Allergopharma, MEDA/Mylan, personal fees from HAL Allergie, grants from ALK Abelló, grants and personal fees from LETI Pharma, grants from Stallergenes, and Quintiles, grants and personal fees from Sanofi, grants from ASIT biotech, and Lofarma, personal fees from Allergy Therapeutics, grants from AstraZeneca, GSK, Immunotek, personal fees from Cassella med outside the submitted work; and Membership: AeDA, DGHNO, Deutsche Akademie für Allergologie und klinische Immunologie, HNO-BV, GPA and EAACI. LMD reports personal fees from Allergy Therapuetics, ALK Abello, AstraZeneca, SanofiGenzyme, Regeneron, GSK, Abionic, outside the submitted work. WGS reports personal fees from Allergy Therapeutics, ALK, Aimmune, FARE, other from DOTS, personal fees from GSK, Novartis, Regeneron, grants and personal fees from Sanofi, outside the submitted work. JAB reports grants and personal fees from Allergy Therapeutics, personal fees from ALK, during the conduct of the study. TMK is under consultancy agreements with Allergy Therapeutics, and is co-founder of Saiba GmbH. MHS, MHB, and UB have nothing to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - The concept of treatment of an allergy with the offending allergen was introduced more than a century ago. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease modifying treatment of allergic diseases caused by inhalational allergens and insect venoms. Despite this, only few AIT products have reached licensure in the US or an official marketing authorization status in European countries. Moreover, most of these AIT products are provided on an individual patient basis as named patient products (NPP) in Europe, while individualized preparations of (mixed) allergenic extract vials for subcutaneous administration (compounding) is common practice in the US. AIT products are generally considered safe and well tolerated, but the major practical clinical development challenge is to define the optimal dose and prove the efficacy and safety of these products using state-of-the art Phase II and pivotal Phase III studies. In planning Phase II-III AIT studies, a thorough understanding of the study challenges is essential (e.g. variability and non-validated status of subjective primary endpoints, limitations of pollen season definitions) and dogmas of these products (e.g., for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) trials double-blinding conditions cannot be maintained, resulting in stronger placebo responses in the active treatment group and inflated treatment effects in Phase III). There is future promise for more objective biomarker endpoints (e.g. basophil activation (CD63 and CD203c), subsets of regulatory dendritic, T and B cells, IL-10-producing group 2 innate lymphoid cells; alone or in combination) to overcome several of these dogmas and challenges; innovation in AIT clinical trials can only progress with integral biomarker research to complement the traditional endpoints in Phase II-III clinical development. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of these dogmas, challenges and recommendations based on published data, to facilitate the design of Phase III studies and improve the evidence basis of safe and effective AIT products.
AB - The concept of treatment of an allergy with the offending allergen was introduced more than a century ago. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease modifying treatment of allergic diseases caused by inhalational allergens and insect venoms. Despite this, only few AIT products have reached licensure in the US or an official marketing authorization status in European countries. Moreover, most of these AIT products are provided on an individual patient basis as named patient products (NPP) in Europe, while individualized preparations of (mixed) allergenic extract vials for subcutaneous administration (compounding) is common practice in the US. AIT products are generally considered safe and well tolerated, but the major practical clinical development challenge is to define the optimal dose and prove the efficacy and safety of these products using state-of-the art Phase II and pivotal Phase III studies. In planning Phase II-III AIT studies, a thorough understanding of the study challenges is essential (e.g. variability and non-validated status of subjective primary endpoints, limitations of pollen season definitions) and dogmas of these products (e.g., for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) trials double-blinding conditions cannot be maintained, resulting in stronger placebo responses in the active treatment group and inflated treatment effects in Phase III). There is future promise for more objective biomarker endpoints (e.g. basophil activation (CD63 and CD203c), subsets of regulatory dendritic, T and B cells, IL-10-producing group 2 innate lymphoid cells; alone or in combination) to overcome several of these dogmas and challenges; innovation in AIT clinical trials can only progress with integral biomarker research to complement the traditional endpoints in Phase II-III clinical development. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of these dogmas, challenges and recommendations based on published data, to facilitate the design of Phase III studies and improve the evidence basis of safe and effective AIT products.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115963285&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100578
DO - 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100578
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34659627
SN - 1939-4551
VL - 14
SP - 100578
JO - World Allergy Organization Journal
JF - World Allergy Organization Journal
IS - 9
M1 - 100578
ER -