Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Defining the clinical validity of genes reported to cause pulmonary arterial hypertension

  • ClinGen PH VCEP
  • , International Consortium for Genetic Studies in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH-ICON) at the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute (PVRI)
  • , Andrea Olschewski

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift (peer-reviewed)Artikel in Fachzeitschrift

Abstract

Purpose: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare, progressive vasculopathy with significant cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality. Genetic testing is currently recommended for adults diagnosed with heritable, idiopathic, anorexigen-, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia–, and congenital heart disease–associated PAH, PAH with overt features of venous/capillary involvement, and all children diagnosed with PAH. Variants in at least 27 genes have putative evidence for PAH causality. Rigorous assessment of the evidence is needed to inform genetic testing. Methods: An international panel of experts in PAH applied a semi-quantitative scoring system developed by the NIH Clinical Genome Resource to classify the relative strength of evidence supporting PAH gene-disease relationships based on genetic and experimental evidence. Results: Twelve genes (BMPR2, ACVRL1, ATP13A3, CAV1, EIF2AK4, ENG, GDF2, KCNK3, KDR, SMAD9, SOX17, and TBX4) were classified as having definitive evidence and 3 genes (ABCC8, GGCX, and TET2) with moderate evidence. Six genes (AQP1, BMP10, FBLN2, KLF2, KLK1, and PDGFD) were classified as having limited evidence for causal effects of variants. TOPBP1 was classified as having no known PAH relationship. Five genes (BMPR1A, BMPR1B, NOTCH3, SMAD1, and SMAD4) were disputed because of a paucity of genetic evidence over time. Conclusion: We recommend that genetic testing includes all genes with definitive evidence and that caution be taken in the interpretation of variants identified in genes with moderate or limited evidence. Genes with no known evidence for PAH or disputed genes should not be included in genetic testing.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer100925
FachzeitschriftGenetics in Medicine
Jahrgang25
Ausgabenummer11
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Nov. 2023
Extern publiziertJa

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

  • Genetik (klinisch)

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Defining the clinical validity of genes reported to cause pulmonary arterial hypertension“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren