TY - JOUR
T1 - Cone-beam CT-based delineation of stereotactic lung targets
T2 - the influence of image modality and target size on interobserver variability
AU - Altorjai, Gabriela
AU - Fotina, Irina
AU - Lütgendorf-Caucig, Carola
AU - Stock, Markus
AU - Pötter, Richard
AU - Georg, Dietmar
AU - Dieckmann, Karin
N1 - Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/2/1
Y1 - 2012/2/1
N2 - PURPOSE: It is generally agreed that the safe implementation of stereotactic body radiotherapy requires image guidance. The aim of this work was to assess interobserver variability in the delineation of lung lesions on cone-beam CT (CBCT) images compared with CT-based contouring for adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy. The influence of target size was also evaluated.METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eight radiation oncologists delineated gross tumor volumes in 12 patient cases (non-small cell lung cancer I-II or solitary metastasis) on planning CTs and on CBCTs. Cases were divided into two groups with tumor diameters of less than (Group A) or more than 2 cm (Group B). Comparison of mean volumes delineated by all observers and range and coefficient of variation were reported for each case and image modality. Interobserver variability was assessed by means of standard error of measurement, conformity index (CI), and its generalized observer-independent approach. The variance between single observers on CT and CBCT images was measured via interobserver reliability coefficient.RESULTS: Interobserver variability on CT images was 17% with 0.79 reliability, compared with 21% variability on CBCT and 0.76 reliability. On both image modalities, values of the intraobserver reliability coefficient (0.99 for CT and 0.97 for CBCT) indicated high reproducibility of results. In general, lower interobserver agreement was observed for small lesions (CI(genA) = 0.62 ± 0.06 vs. CI(genB) = 0.70 ± 0.03, p < 0.05). The analysis of single patient cases revealed that presence of spicules, diffuse infiltrations, proximity of the tumors to the vessels and thoracic wall, and respiration motion artifacts presented the main sources of the variability.CONCLUSION: Interobserver variability for Stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer and lung metastasis was slightly higher on CBCT compared with CT. Absence of significant differences in interobserver variability suggests that CBCT imaging provides an effective tool for tumor localization, and image data could be also used for target volume delineation purposes.
AB - PURPOSE: It is generally agreed that the safe implementation of stereotactic body radiotherapy requires image guidance. The aim of this work was to assess interobserver variability in the delineation of lung lesions on cone-beam CT (CBCT) images compared with CT-based contouring for adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy. The influence of target size was also evaluated.METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eight radiation oncologists delineated gross tumor volumes in 12 patient cases (non-small cell lung cancer I-II or solitary metastasis) on planning CTs and on CBCTs. Cases were divided into two groups with tumor diameters of less than (Group A) or more than 2 cm (Group B). Comparison of mean volumes delineated by all observers and range and coefficient of variation were reported for each case and image modality. Interobserver variability was assessed by means of standard error of measurement, conformity index (CI), and its generalized observer-independent approach. The variance between single observers on CT and CBCT images was measured via interobserver reliability coefficient.RESULTS: Interobserver variability on CT images was 17% with 0.79 reliability, compared with 21% variability on CBCT and 0.76 reliability. On both image modalities, values of the intraobserver reliability coefficient (0.99 for CT and 0.97 for CBCT) indicated high reproducibility of results. In general, lower interobserver agreement was observed for small lesions (CI(genA) = 0.62 ± 0.06 vs. CI(genB) = 0.70 ± 0.03, p < 0.05). The analysis of single patient cases revealed that presence of spicules, diffuse infiltrations, proximity of the tumors to the vessels and thoracic wall, and respiration motion artifacts presented the main sources of the variability.CONCLUSION: Interobserver variability for Stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer and lung metastasis was slightly higher on CBCT compared with CT. Absence of significant differences in interobserver variability suggests that CBCT imaging provides an effective tool for tumor localization, and image data could be also used for target volume delineation purposes.
KW - Analysis of Variance
KW - Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnostic imaging
KW - Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
KW - Humans
KW - Lung/diagnostic imaging
KW - Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
KW - Observer Variation
KW - Radiation Oncology
KW - Radiosurgery
KW - Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Statistics, Nonparametric
KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
KW - Tumor Burden
KW - Conformity index
KW - CBCT
KW - Target volume delineation
KW - SBRT
KW - Interobserver variability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855855264&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.042
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.042
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 21620581
SN - 0360-3016
VL - 82
SP - e265-e272
JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
IS - 2
ER -