Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Comparison of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in elderly versus younger patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Analysis of a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study

  • Gerald W Prager
  • , Leopold Oehler
  • , Armin Gerger
  • , Brigitte Mlineritsch
  • , Johannes Andel
  • , Andreas Petzer
  • , Klaus Wilthoner
  • , Thamer Sliwa
  • , Petra Pichler
  • , Thomas Winder
  • , Sonja Heibl
  • , Birgit Gruenberger
  • , Friedrich Laengle
  • , Eva Hubmann
  • , Markus Korger
  • , Martin Pecherstorfer
  • , Angela Djanani
  • , Hans-Joerg Neumann
  • , Kathrin Philipp-Abbrederis
  • , Ewald Wöll
  • Robert Trondl, Catharina Arnold-Schrauf, Wolfgang Eisterer

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift (peer-reviewed)Artikel in Fachzeitschrift

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer (PC) ranks among the deadliest malignancies worldwide. In the MPACT study, first-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/G) demonstrated activity (median overall survival [OS], 8.7 months) and tolerability in patients with metastatic PC (mPC). However, the clinical evidence of nab-P/G in the elderly (>70 years), who account for the majority of patients with mPC, is limited. This is the first prospective, multicentre, non-interventional study evaluating the tolerability and effectiveness of nab-P/G in younger (≤70 years) versus elderly (>70 years) patients with mPC in the daily clinical routine.

METHODS: Eligible patients with mPC were treated with nab-P/G and observed until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objectives were safety and tolerability of nab-P/G, and the secondary objectives were efficacy and real-life dosing.

RESULTS: A total of 317 patients with mPC (median age, 70 years) were recruited, of which 299, aged ≤70 (n = 162) and >70 (n = 137) years, were eligible for analysis. Baseline characteristics and the safety profile were comparable between the groups. However, fatigue (22.8% versus 13.0%) and decreased appetite (8.8% versus 1.2%) were more frequent in elderly patients. Younger versus elderly patients equally benefited in terms of objective response rate (36% versus 48%), median progression-free survival (5.6 versus 5.5 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.03; p = 0.81) and OS (10.6 versus 10.2 months; HR = 0.89; p = 0.4). In addition, the median treatment duration (5 versus 4 cycles), relative dose intensity (70% versus 74%) or reasons for treatment discontinuation were similar. Most patients (56.2% versus 47.4%) benefited from a second-line therapy.

CONCLUSION: This prospective real-world analysis confirms the feasibility and tolerability of nab-P/G treatment and reveals OS data similar for younger patients and elderly patients aged >70 years. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV REGISTRATION: NCT02555813.

AUSTRIAN NIS REGISTRY: NIS005071.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)101-112
Seitenumfang12
FachzeitschriftEuropean Journal of Cancer
Jahrgang143
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Jan. 2021

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Comparison of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in elderly versus younger patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Analysis of a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren