Burden, treatment use, and outcome of secondary mitral regurgitation across the spectrum of heart failure: observational cohort study

Philipp E Bartko, Gregor Heitzinger, Noemi Pavo, Maria Heitzinger, Georg Spinka, Suriya Prausmüller, Henrike Arfsten, Martin Andreas, Cornelia Gabler, Guido Strunk, Julia Mascherbauer, Christian Hengstenberg, Martin Hülsmann, Georg Goliasch

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift (peer-reviewed)Artikel in Fachzeitschrift

36 Zitate (Scopus)


OBJECTIVES: To define prevalence, long term outcome, and treatment standards of secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) across the heart failure spectrum.

DESIGN: Large scale cohort study.

SETTING: Observational cohort study with data from the Viennese community healthcare provider network between 2010 and 2020, Austria.

PARTICIPANTS: 13 223 patients with sMR across all heart failure subtypes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Association between sMR and mortality in patients assigned by guideline diagnostic criteria to one of three heart failure subtypes: reduced, mid-range, and preserved ejection fraction, was assessed.

RESULTS: Severe sMR was diagnosed in 1317 patients (10%), correlated with increasing age (P<0.001), occurred across the entire spectrum of heart failure, and was most common in 656 (25%) of 2619 patients with reduced ejection fraction. Mortality of patients with severe sMR was higher than expected for people of the same age and sex in the same community (hazard ratio 7.53; 95% confidence interval 6.83 to 8.30, P<0.001). In comparison with patients with heart failure and no/mild sMR, mortality increased stepwise with a hazard ratio of 1.29 (95% confidence interval 1.20 to 1.38, P<0.001) for moderate and 1.82 (1.64 to 2.02, P<0.001) for severe sMR. The association between severe sMR and excess mortality was consistent after multivariate adjustment and across all heart failure subgroups (mid-range ejection fraction: hazard ratio 2.53 (95% confidence interval 2.00 to 3.19, P<0.001), reduced ejection fraction: 1.70 (1.43 to 2.03, P<0.001), and preserved ejection fraction: 1.52 (1.25 to 1.85, P<0.001)). Despite available state-of-the-art healthcare, high volume heart failure, and valve disease programmes, severe sMR was rarely treated by surgical valve repair (7%) or replacement (5%); low risk transcatheter repair (4%) was similarly seldom used.

CONCLUSION: Secondary mitral regurgitation is common overall, increasing with age and associated with excess mortality. The association with adverse outcome is significant across the entire heart failure spectrum but most pronounced in those with mid-range and reduced ejection fractions. Despite these poor outcomes, surgical valve repair or replacement are rarely performed; similarly, low risk transcatheter repair, specifically in the heart failure subsets with the highest expected benefit from treatment, is seldom used. The current data suggest an increasing demand for treatment, particularly in view of an expected increase in heart failure in an ageing population.

Seiten (von - bis)n1421
FachzeitschriftThe BMJ
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 30 Juni 2021


Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Burden, treatment use, and outcome of secondary mitral regurgitation across the spectrum of heart failure: observational cohort study“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren